The 5 Key Legal Considerations for Companies Going Remote
Here are a few important legal considerations to keep in mind as you transition your teams to remote work.
March 24, 2020 at 11:48 AM
4 minute read
In the wake of the current public health crisis, many companies have transitioned to remote capabilities and a remote workforce—virtually overnight. While many companies have found a way to keep their businesses running and their staff employed by tapping into a wide array of remote work and collaboration tools, there are some important legal ramifications to consider as part of your overall business requirements.
At the same time, as companies are embracing a new way of work, they must also re-calibrate their legal checklist and make sure they're taking the necessary precautions to protect themselves, their employees, their clients and their data.
Here are a few important legal considerations to keep in mind as you transition your teams to remote work:
Strengthen Your Authentication
With the vast majority of your workforce working from home, authentication becomes an important line of defense in ensuring control of who accesses your business network, communications and data. If you haven't already, implement two-factor authentication.
This form of authentication relies on two points of verification from a versatile range of options, including text messages, apps and traditional passwords. Google Authenticator, Duo Mobile, Twilio Authy and LastPass Authenticator are all great options.
Reconsider Network Security
Depending on their business privacy and security needs, companies need to decide how they're going to manage network security across a remote workforce. Are you comfortable with employees accessing your network on their own at-home Wi-Fi connections? If not, you might want to consider VPNs or other secure networks.
This is also the time to remind your employees about general cybersecurity best practices, such as how to identify scams or phishing, and avoiding opening links or attachments from unknown senders.
Keep Confidential Information Off Insecure Chat Platforms
Companies need to make sure their employees understand where they can and cannot discuss confidential information. In general, it's best to confine these kinds of conversations to traditional channels, such as phone or via encrypted email. If you are discussing business matters on chat, be sure you're using secure platforms. Establish guidelines for remote teams as to what types of conversations and content can or cannot be shared over chat platforms.
As a general precaution, however, it's a good idea to limit chat discussions to nonspecific information. Avoid sharing any private, confidential information or links to documents.
Be Careful Where You Store Your Data
Along with chat platforms and general network security, companies need to be sure they're storing their data in a secure location. From phone calls and transcriptions to emails, documents, presentations and databases, companies must protect the data they rely on—data that often includes client information. Network-attached storage (NAS) and cloud storage likely offer the best options for remote workers.
Lean Into Automation
The recent mass migration to remote work is a good reminder to companies to automate as many business processes as possible. Manual processes often require employees to be physically present in the office, requires more access and most importantly is most vulnerable to failings and breakages. Now is the time, if possible, to automate established processes you have if you have not already done so, such as systems that incorporate automated approval capabilities to allow executives to approve contracts or other matters remotely.
The Bottom Line
A shift to an almost entirely remote workforce is uncharted territory for many companies, but there are simple measures and precautions that go a long way in protecting businesses, employees and clients. Like any learning process, companies are likely to glean more insights over time about what works for their workforce and business model. These legal considerations can provide a helpful starting point.
Monica Zent is ZentLaw's CEO and founder of LawDesk 360.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
Trending Stories
- 1LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 2An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 3Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
- 4How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 5Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250