Fired General Counsel Must Take Racial, Gender Discrimination Claims to Arbitration
"We agree with the court's decision as it is in line with case law in this jurisdiction," Elior Shiloh, an attorney for film production company Cinereach, said on Wednesday.
March 25, 2020 at 03:39 PM
3 minute read
The former general counsel of a not-for-profit film production company must take her gender, racial and disability discrimination claims to arbitration because the personnel policy she signed before her employment began requires arbitration for employment disputes, a federal judge ruled this week.
In January 2019, Woo Jung Cho filed suit against Cinereach Ltd. and its executive director, Philipp Engelhorn, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Cho, who was hired in 2014 as head of business affairs and made general counsel in 2015, claimed she was harassed by the company's white male employees and claims Engelhorn did little to change the alleged toxic culture of the company. Cho further alleges that Engelhorn retaliated against her by locking her out of her email while she was on medical leave. Cho was fired from Cinereach in 2018 while still on medical leave.
In February 2019, the defendants filed a motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the complaint. They argued Cho signed a personnel policy that compelled arbitration for employee disputes before she began working at Cinereach. Cho argued that her offer of employment letter did not mention mandatory arbitration and the personnel policy was not binding.
U.S. District Judge John Koeltl said the offer of employment letter did not need to have the mandatory arbitration agreement in it.
"The plaintiff subsequently received and, on March 31, 2014, signed the acknowledgment form in connection with the personnel policy that included the arbitration provision," Koeltl wrote in the opinion.
A part of the personnel policy Cho signed said: "Nothing in this personnel policy is to be construed as a binding contract with Cinereach or a guarantee of continuity of employment, benefits or rights." However, Koeltl said the language of the part of the policy Cho points to does nothing more than create an at-will employment relationship with Cho.
The part of the policy which requires arbitration is written in "distinct and mandatory terms," Koeltl said.
Cinereach and Engelhorn are represented by Elior Shiloh of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith in New York and Rebecca Ann Goldstein of Littler Mendelson in New York.
"We agree with the court's decision as it is in line with case law in this jurisdiction," Shiloh said on Wednesday.
Cho is represented by Owen Laird and Veronica S. Jung of the Law Offices of Veronica S. Jung in New York. They did not immediately respond to request for comment on Wednesday.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEmployers Race to File NLRB Petitions to Gain Upper Hand in Union Organizing
5 minute readTractor Supply Co.'s Stock Takes Hit After Activists Bash Its Embrace of DEI
6 minute readCorporate Boards May Be Underestimating the Talent Challenges Ahead
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250