In-House Lawyers to Big Law: Enough Already With the Coronavirus Webinars
"Information overload has already been a problem and this has only made it worse," said Salary.com's top lawyer, Colin Levy.
March 25, 2020 at 02:24 PM
5 minute read
This might come as a shock to some Big Law firms, but in-house lawyers throughout the world are sick of the unrelenting barrage of coronavirus-related emails and webinar invitations.
Caitlin "Cat" Moon, director of Innovation Design for the Program on Law and Innovation at Vanderbilt Law School, dropped that bombshell by way of a Tuesday evening Twitter post. Her tweet has garnered hundreds of "likes," dozens of retweets and set off an entertaining and informative thread involving not only in-house lawyers but at least one Big Law partner.
Moon wrote: "Dear law firms, Just talked w/ two of your big clients. They're getting 250+ emails a day from y'all offering webinars on #coronavirus crisis updates. They don't have time to attend your webinars. What they want? Max 1-page summary of what they need to know. You're welcome."
She added: "Pro tip: ASK YOUR CLIENTS WHAT THEY NEED FROM YOU RIGHT NOW. Whoever is telling you to produce webinars has not talked to your clients."
Some in-house counsel who applauded Moon for speaking out about COVID-19 information overload include Microsoft Corp. assistant general counsel Dennis Garcia, Salary.com's top lawyer, Colin Levy, and Euan Sinclair, senior legal counsel for the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia.
"Why is it so hard? I had a global GC say to me yesterday 'I am getting flooded with updates on force majeur [sic] clauses but only two partners have called me in the last two weeks. WTF!,'" tweeted Alex Smith, the London-based global product management lead for iManage RAVN. Smith formerly served as the innovation manager for Reed Smith.
Moon said Wednesday in an interview that she hadn't expected to spark such a strong reaction. Much of her work is focused on delivering client-centered legal services, and she said the way in which some firms are delivering coronavirus info to clients "obviously does not check that box very well."
She added, "I think there's a desire to serve and meet clients' needs and help them. And that desire should start with just reaching out to clients."
It's not just in-house lawyers who are annoyed with the deluge of COVID-19 information.
In a reply to Moon's tweet, K&L Gates partner Daniel Farris in Chicago wrote: "Good God, yes. THIS! 100%. I am a #biglaw #attorney and I get 50+ emails a day about #COVID offerings. I cannot imagine how bad it is for my #Inhouse colleagues. I have personally declined to participate in many. #firms should LISTEN. Clients will tell you what they need."
Farris was voicing his personal opinion, but doing so was brave considering the fact that K&L Gates and virtually every other sizable firm in the country, if not the world, have been churning out a seemingly endless stream of COVID-19 content.
Of course, many media outlets are guilty as well.
Jeff Carr, former general counsel for Univar Solutions, tweeted that he was still getting hit with a daily tsunami of coronavirus content from law firms even though he was no longer a GC. He called it an "infodemic."
People are hungry for coronavirus information, but the producers of that information need to be delivering content that is as useful as it is succinct.
"From my perspective, I tend to think that it's great they're sending out these emails and everything, but honestly, as Cat mentioned in her tweet, I don't have time to listen to a webinar right now," said Levy of Salary.com.
"Information overload has already been a problem and this has only made it worse," he added.
Cameron Findlay, general counsel for Archer Daniels Midland Co., wrote in an email that he appreciates that firms are offering help and information, but said all the emails, especially from firms that he's not worked with previously, "can be a little overwhelming and off-putting."
"In-house lawyers are swamped with work and crisis management, and in many cases are working under stress from home, with constant interruptions from family and pets," he added. "A firm should really think hard about whether sending constant emails, holding webinars, and so forth is actually helpful, or makes the firm seem tone-deaf in the middle of a pandemic."
As for Moon, she has found some peace by disabling her news notifications. Now, she seeks out the information she wants rather than allowing it to come to her.
"That's working out well for me," she said. "I feel a lot less anxiety."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Dana Rao Built a 'Yes' Culture at Adobe and Why He Walked Away
FTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Discover Hires Interim Legal Chief as $35B Sale to Capital One Faces New Hurdles
Law Firms Mentioned
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250