Trying to Manage Cross-Border Risks in a Volatile and Uncertain Time
Ray Liu, who is also a former in-house counsel for the New York branch of the Bank of China, spoke Thursday during his law firm's webinar on "Legal Tools for Managing Cross-Border Risk in a COVID-19 World."
March 26, 2020 at 05:32 PM
4 minute read
When international law firm Dorsey & Whitney wanted to talk to companies about cross-border issues arising from the coronavirus pandemic, it turned to the heads of its offices in Beijing and Hong Kong, who have been dealing with the issues for nearly three months.
The lawyers called the COVID-19 environment "an ultimate VUCA," which stands for volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity, especially for every general counsel trying to deal with virus-related issues.
One of the trickiest issues for companies in contracts with Chinese firms is the concept of force majeure. That's because mainland China does not recognize common-law precedents but is ruled by civil law and statutes, explained Ray Liu, chief of the Beijing office.
Liu, who is also a former in-house counsel for the New York branch of the Bank of China, spoke Thursday during his law firm's webinar on "Legal Tools for Managing Cross-Border Risk in a COVID-19 World."
Even if force majeure—unforeseen circumstances that can exempt a party from its contract obligations—is present under the law, Liu said the party seeking an exemption still has to meet several other criteria, including notifying the other party and obtaining a force majeure certificate from a government-sponsored agency.
In the United States, he said, the moving party would still have to prove that circumstances in fact rendered performance impossible. In the United Kingdom, the certificate is simply supplementary proof of force majeure and is not by itself conclusive.
Simon Chan, head of the law firm's Hong Kong office, said a key factor is that the Chinese government has declared that COVID-19 is an "unforeseeable, unavoidable and insurmountable" event.
Even if a contract does not expressly include an epidemic as an excuse for nonperformance, Chan said parties could look to a catch-all phrase supported by the government's declaration.
Most cross-border contracts with a China firm will require applying Chinese law, he added.
The webinar also looked at how countries are providing financial relief through various measures, including tax cuts, low-interest loans, loan payment extensions and outright handouts. These stimulus measures will be specific to each country and in some cases specific to regions or municipalities.
Lastly, the webinar looked at the impact of government measures. Hong Kong has imposed limited measures, Chan said, that do not stop commercial activity nor require people to stay at home.
Chan spoke of the "draconian measures" enforced in mainland China to try to stop the virus' spread, as well as tough restrictions imposed by the European Union, the U.K. and the U.S., where non-essential businesses have closed.
First Hong Kong closed its borders with mainland China, and eventually closed its links with the rest of the world, such as airports and ferries. These measures have primarily affected international businesses that rely on deliveries from other countries.
The government, he added, has just begun to ban sales of alcohol in all Hong Kong bars and restaurants, which otherwise are open for business as usual.
In mainland China, where the government has shut down most businesses and ordered people to shelter in place in key provinces, Liu said there can be serious civil and criminal liabilities for disobeying an order.
Until the virus totally subsides, the webinar also offered several best practices for companies. They include:
- Have necessary supplies such as face masks, thermometers and sanitizers for disease prevention and control in place.
- Closely monitor health conditions of employees and visitors.
- Appropriately ventilate, clean and sanitize the working space on a regular basis.
- Immediately report any confirmed or suspected infection and provide other necessary information to disease prevention and control organizations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
Newly Public Biotech Startup Hires Life Sciences Veteran as GC
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250