Strategic Sourcing Technology for Legal Service Procurement
By using RFPs, companies can engage with law firms outside of their existing network to find the best possible combination of experience, services and pricing.
March 30, 2020 at 01:50 PM
5 minute read
It's no secret that corporate legal teams are under tremendous pressure to manage spend and operate more efficiently. These imperatives have led to a renewed focus on how legal service providers are selected—which brings us to the rise of the legal request for proposal (RFP).
For several years now, more and more corporate legal teams have been embracing the RFP process as a way to be more methodical and deliberate. A Legaltech News article points out that by using RFPs, companies can engage with law firms outside of their existing network to find the best possible combination of experience, services and pricing.
However, along with the change comes a challenge: The traditional RFP process is complex and time-consuming. From creating and issuing a detailed RFP to collecting and evaluating proposals, RFPs are still largely manual, and therefore, somewhat tedious. Luckily, RFP technology has emerged and is poised to transform legal procurement for corporate legal teams.
Why Legal Procurement and RFP Technology Are a Perfect Match
RFPs empower corporate legal teams with a strategic, data-driven way to find the right law firm partner. However, issuing and administering the RFP then evaluating the results manually is a challenge. Similarly, law firms struggle to collaborate effectively, customize proposal content and meet RFP deadlines.
Full-circle RFP management software enables both corporate legal teams and law firms to work more effectively by centralizing and automating the process from beginning to end. Because it improves the entire RFP lifecycle, everyone benefits from more effective RFPs, clearer communication and faster outcomes. For corporate legal teams, RFP software enables users to collaborate on RFP requirements, create and store templates, centralize vendor profiles and communications and automate the law firm evaluation process.
In a recent webinar, Matthew Prinn of RFP Advisory Group addressed the shift toward technology saying, "RFPs used to be very old-fashioned, but now there's a handful of products on the market that allow general counsel and legal operations folks to issue RFPs much quicker, grade them much easier and have their entire legal team collaborate on grading the response in a much more efficient process."
Three Ways RFP Software Makes Legal Service Procurement Easier
- Create RFPs faster with profiles and dynamic templates.
Effective RFPs need to ask the right people the right questions. But, deciding which law firm is best suited to a matter can require a lot of research. However, RFP software allows corporate legal teams to create a catalog of law firm profiles. These profiles are living documents that are used to gather their background, qualifications and billing structure. Then, a simple search filters the firm profiles and narrows the list of RFP recipients to only the most qualified outside counsel candidates.
When it comes to creating an effective RFP, it has to ask the right questions. With RFP software, dynamic RFx templates are easy to create. Questions can be saved and grouped into sections to make building any questionnaire fast and easy. In a matter of minutes, an RFP can be created that asks all the required questions about the firm's background, expertise, billing structure, delivery approach and more.
- Centralized RFP issuing, administration and law firm communication.
When the RFP is ready and the right firms are selected, it can be issued with instructions included and attachments shared with the click of a button. Before, corporate legal teams often had to wait weeks to find out which firms were going to submit proposals. With real-time progress reporting in RFP software, there's no mystery about who is working on the RFP.
In addition, RFP software centralizes communication with firms so all questions about the project can be tracked and managed in one place. In-house legal teams can share updates, provide clarification, extend a deadline and more within the tool—saving inboxes from overflowing.
- Side-by-side, data-driven law firm evaluation and selection.
Once the legal procurement team has received all of the responses, evaluating them can get messy. Nancey Watson, a legal RFP consultant, discussed the challenge in an interview saying that in-house departments struggle to work through and score complex proposals. She goes on to mention a company that took a staggering (and costly) 18 months to work through their law firm selection process.
RFP technology truly transforms the evaluation process. Within the platform, corporate legal teams can establish criteria and weights to automate proposal scoring. They can also assign questions and sections to the most knowledgeable stakeholders for scoring input. Once scored, evaluation is made even easier with side-by-side comparisons and visual reports of the results.
In addition, reports with historical data and previous responses can quickly be created to see how a firm's proposals and pricing have changed over time.
Technology to Improve the Future of Legal Sourcing
RFPs empower corporate legal teams to find the best firm at the best value. At the same time, RFP technology makes issuing complete, effective RFPs easier and faster. As time goes on, it's no surprise that corporate legal teams are adopting new RFP technology that is delivering value to their business as well as benefits to the law firms that serve them.
Beau Wysong is chief marketing officer at RFP360. He leverages his extensive background in technology marketing and sales to drive business growth for the software company. Beau is responsible for building a market-leading brand, engaging customers and educating future customers with knowledge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250