More Legal Departments Are Taking Control of the Cybersecurity Budget
"Assigning the budget to the department with responsibility for compliance gives them the power and authority to act," Michael Rynowecer, president of BTI Consulting Group in Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts, said.
March 31, 2020 at 05:18 PM
3 minute read
An increasing number of companies are placing their cybersecurity budgets in the hands of their legal departments because of increased compliance efforts and scrutiny from regulators.
According to BTI Consulting Group's Cybersecurity & Data Privacy 2020 report, 46% of companies put the legal department in charge of the cybersecurity budget. The report states that 20% of respondents said the budget is held by information technology, 19.9% in privacy and data security, 7% in compliance, and 6.9% responded the budget is in another department.
The numbers in the report are based on interviews with more than 250 corporate legal decision-makers, including chief compliance officers, chief privacy officers and chief privacy counsel.
Michael Rynowecer, president of BTI Consulting Group in Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts, said the trend of legal departments housing the cybersecurity budget has moved upward over the past couple of years. He said he would expect the number of companies that put legal in charge of the cybersecurity budget will increase.
"Assigning the budget to the department with responsibility for compliance gives them the power and authority to act," Rynowecer said.
The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation and the California Consumer Privacy Act have forced companies to put a greater focus on data privacy and compliance. The changing data privacy and cybersecurity climate make legal "a good crossroad for the budget to sit," Mark Yacano, global practice leader with Major, Lindsey & Africa's transform advisory services in Washington, D.C, said in an interview.
Yacano explained that because legal departments are more often interacting with different elements of the business, those attorneys can "proactively shield the company from risk" by handling cybersecurity budgets and deciding the best ways to prevent a data breach in conjunction with the information technology function.
Allowing only the legal department to totally control the cybersecurity budget "reinforces siloing," Edward McAndrew, a partner at DLA Piper in Washington, D.C., said.
"Siloing is problematic in this area," McAndrew said. "If you think about a cyber incident, you're going to need a multidisciplinary team including legal, information technology, communications, compliance to come together to work on the issue."
He explained that there may be complications tied back to who controls what part of the budget when searching for vendors.
"Legal could be saying we want to bring in a particular service provider, and IT could be thinking something else," McAndrew said.
For companies to have one department control the cybersecurity budget, they need to make certain there is an effective communication line between departments.
"The disadvantage is that legal may not be in a position to make all of the decisions within the scope of the budget," Yacano said. "I think if the governance mechanism for how you approach cybersecurity is not sound there could be issues."
"The best strategy is to work with IT to ensure everyone understands the risks and exposures," Rynowecer said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSurvey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
Private Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
SEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Appears Sympathetic to Law Requiring Porn Sites to Verify Users' Age
- 2Cybersecurity Breaches, Cyberbullying, and Ways to Help Protect Clients From Both
- 3AI in 2025: Five Key Predictions on How It Will Reshape International Law Firms
- 4Justice Known for Asking 'Tough Questions' Resolves to Improve Civility
- 5Robinson & Cole Elects New Partners and Counsel
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250