New York Loosens Rules for In-House Counsel Registration
"The revisions bring us in line with the requirements in states like California and could prove beneficial for smaller businesses for whom the often high cost of retaining permanent in-house counsel is prohibitive," Joshua Hale Abramson and Njeri Sarah Chasseau, co-chairs of the New York County Lawyers Association In-House/Outside Counsel Committee, said in a statement to Corporate Counsel.
April 01, 2020 at 07:37 PM
3 minute read
The New York Court of Appeals amended the rules this week for in-house counsel to register with the state by clarifying there is no residency requirement and by also allowing attorneys who only work part-time in the state to register.
The amendment, which also authorizes a 90-day period to allow for in-house attorneys to register without penalty for not doing so previously, will become effective April 15.
Richard Maltz, counsel to the professional responsibility group at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz in New York, said in an interview with Corporate Counsel that in 2015 the New York Court of Appeals allowed for out-of-state in-house counsel to register in New York. However, it only gave attorneys 30 days after the beginning of their employment to do so and was only applicable to attorneys who worked in New York full time.
"Another problem was that lawyers were coming into New York three-quarters of the time but did not qualify to register under the rule," Maltz explained.
Maltz said he was on the New York City Bar Association subcommittee and helped recommend the rule changes. He said another member of the subcommittee recommended rule changes for foreign attorneys. The New York Court of Appeals now allows for foreign attorneys working in-house in New York to show they are in good standing by an affidavit if their "home jurisdiction is unable to provide proof of good standing because of a lack of structure of legal oversight of in-house counsel in that jurisdiction."
Maltz noted that those who register as in-house counsel may only act to advise their employer and are not permitted to practice law in New York as an attorney who is admitted to the New York State Bar.
Joshua Hale Abramson and Njeri Sarah Chasseau, co-chairs of the New York County Lawyers Association In-House/Outside Counsel Committee, said in a joint statement to Corporate Counsel the changes are "largely positive."
"The revisions bring us in line with the requirements in states like California and could prove beneficial for smaller businesses for whom the often high cost of retaining permanent in-house counsel is prohibitive," Abramson and Chasseau said.
A representative from the New York State Bar Association was not immediately available to comment Wednesday.
The majority of states have rules governing how in-house counsel should register with the state, according to the American Bar Association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFactSet Finds New Legal Chief at Financial Data Rival S&P
11 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1King & Spalding E-Discovery Director Jumps to Nebraska Women-Owned Firm
- 2Nation's Largest Utility Parts Ways With CLO Who Helped It Navigate Bribery Scandal
- 3Advocates Renew Campaign for Immigrant Right to Counsel in New York
- 4From ‘Unregulated’ to ‘A Matter of Great Concern’: PFAS Regulation under Biden
- 5Public Interest Lawyers in NY Fear Rollback of Federal Loan Assistance in '25, Ask Gov. to Add $4M to State Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250