New Trump Order Could Impact Telecom Company Licenses Past and Present
"I have heard concerns that this [attorney general's control] risks greater politicization of the process," said Washington, D.C., telecom lawyer Brian Murray.
April 07, 2020 at 05:04 PM
4 minute read
The new executive order by President Donald Trump involving review of licensing for telecommunications companies that have "foreign participation" has raised a number of legal concerns.
Trump signed the Order on Establishing the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector on April 3 and almost immediately telecom attorney Brian Murray said general counsel started calling.
The order says the new committee can review the granting or transfer of licenses by the Federal Communications Commission for "risks to national security or law enforcement interests."
It also says the committee "may review existing licenses to identify any additional or new risks to national security or law enforcement interests of the U.S." In other words, any telecom network applying for a license, seeking to transfer a license or holding an existing license could be affected.
The U.S. Department of Justice said Tuesday that Attorney General William Barr would head the committee. "In the digital age, our telecommunications networks are more important than ever, and not just to the economy," Barr said in a statement. "This is a national security and public safety issue. That's why the federal government must be vigilant and ensure that a foreign adversary cannot undermine the networks our country depends on."
Still, the order has some general counsel worried. Murray, a partner at Wilkinson Barker Knauer in Washington, D.C., told Corporate Counsel, "If I were a general counsel, I would be concerned about the extent to which the FCC, aided and abetted by this committee, might start to reopen old business. Especially if I'm a company with some amount of foreign ownership or a foreign role in my business, such as equipment."
Two general counsel, he said, have already questioned him about that aspect of the order.
Other concerns mentioned to Murray include:
- Will the reviewing of past licenses be broadened to include experimental licenses or licenses granting special temporary authority?
- The order specifically puts the attorney general in charge of the committee, which includes the Secretaries of Homeland Security and Defense along with other interagency officials. "I have heard concerns that this [attorney general control] risks greater politicization of the process," Murray said.
- Previously, the FCC used the phrase "foreign participation" to mean foreign investment or control. Will the committee expand the phrase to include use of foreign equipment in U.S. systems or other types of foreign influence on U.S. licensed companies?
- The FCC has been trying to reform its rulemaking authority involving foreign ownership since 2016. Will the order resolve all the open issues discussed under that process?
FCC chairman Ajit Pai on Monday issued a statement applauding the order. Pai added, "Now that this executive order has been issued, the FCC will move forward to conclude our own pending rulemaking on reform of the foreign ownership review process. As we demonstrated last year in rejecting the China Mobile application, this FCC will not hesitate to act to protect our networks from foreign threats."
The executive order formalizes what was an informal interagency process in the past, dubbed Team Telecom. Murray calls the new committee Team Telecom 2.0.
The federal government has talked of formalizing the process for several years, he said, so the concept of the committee didn't surprise him. However, "certainly seeing it emerge from the shadows of the coronavirus on a Saturday afternoon did," he said.
The best-case scenario, Murray said, would be if the new committee "merely memorializes the unwritten protocols as they existed, but with more predictability."
Some of general counsel's concerns may be addressed soon because the order also mandates the committee, within 90 days, to reach a memorandum of understanding on how to implement the process.
"We don't know if the memorandum will be made public," Murray said. "We hope it will be. If not, the concerns will remain."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
5 minute readGlobal Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Alameda Judge Ursula Jones Dickson Chosen as District Attorney
- 2'A Long 6 Years': No $150M for Goldman Sachs Investors
- 3Ex-Appellate Court Judges Launch Boutique Focused on Plaintiffs Appeals
- 4Judge Tanks Prevailing Pittsburgh Attorneys' $2.45M Fee Request to $250K
- 5Attorneys Leading $10M Pension Settlement Against CITGO Score $4M Payday
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250