Wells Fargo Balks, So Federal Reserve Loosens Reins on Coronavirus-Related Loans
The Federal Reserve said it continues to hold the bank accountable for addressing "the widespread breakdowns that resulted in harm to consumers" and for completing the requirements of a 2018 consent agreement.
April 08, 2020 at 05:40 PM
3 minute read
After Wells Fargo & Co. put a limit on its financial help for small businesses hit by the coronavirus, the Federal Reserve Board on Wednesday agreed to loosen its leash on the bank so that it can loan more. The bank immediately expanded its participation in the Paycheck Protection Program.
Before Wednesday, the government counted any coronavirus-related loan against the bank's growth cap. The Fed imposed the cap on San Francisco-based Wells Fargo in 2018 as part of an enforcement action over numerous compliance failures and scandals, including opening millions of fake bank accounts.
Due to the cap, the bank set a $10 billion limit on the amount it would loan under the government's coronavirus programs. On April 5 Wells Fargo said that in only a few days it had received enough loan applications to exceed the $10 billion pool, and it cut off any more applicants.
The bank's cutoff was important because it made more small business loans last year than any other U.S. lender and was leaving many of those customers unaided.
So the Fed backed off, a little.
In an amendment to the 2018 consent order, the Fed said it "will temporarily and narrowly modify the growth restriction on Wells Fargo so that it can provide additional support to small businesses." Under the change, loans made as part of the government's coronavirus program will not count against Wells Fargo's growth cap.
The amendment referred communications about the order to Wells Fargo general counsel Ellen Patterson in New York; the board's deputy general counsel Richard Ashton and senior special counsel Jason Gonzalez in Washington, D.C.; and Summer Cole, vice president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Patterson did not immediately return a message seeking comment.
The Fed's announcement said, "The board's growth restriction was implemented because of widespread compliance and operational breakdowns that resulted in harm to consumers and because the company's activities were ineffectively overseen by its board of directors." The announcement said Wednesday's changes "do not otherwise modify the board's enforcement action. … The board continues to hold the company accountable for successfully addressing the widespread breakdowns that resulted in harm to consumers identified as part of that action and for completing the requirements of the agreement."
In a statement, Wells Fargo CEO Charles Scharf said, "While we are pleased to be able to help more small businesses through the Paycheck Protection Program, we note that the Federal Reserve's action does not—and should not—in any way relieve us of our obligations under the consent order. … Until our work is completed to the Federal Reserve's satisfaction, we will continue to actively make decisions on how to allocate our balance sheet to support the needs of our customers under the existing asset cap."
The Fed said the change will also apply to Wells Fargo's participation in its forthcoming Main Street Lending Program, which was announced March 23. The $454 billion program, expected to be unveiled this week, will support lending to midsize companies with up to 10,000 employees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
Amex Latest Target as Regulators Scrutinize Whether Credit Card Issuers Deliver on Rewards Promises
Former Capital One Deputy GC Takes Legal Reins of AIG Spinoff
Trending Stories
- 1Alameda Judge Ursula Jones Dickson Chosen as District Attorney
- 2'A Long 6 Years': No $150M for Goldman Sachs Investors
- 3Ex-Appellate Court Judges Launch Boutique Focused on Plaintiffs Appeals
- 4Judge Tanks Prevailing Pittsburgh Attorneys' $2.45M Fee Request to $250K
- 5Attorneys Leading $10M Pension Settlement Against CITGO Score $4M Payday
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250