In Unusual Statement, 2 SEC Officials Urge Companies to Talk About the Future
The statement ties the nation's recovery from COVID-19 to companies' willingness to file robust disclosures. "This is a clarion call to speak out ... [and] an affirmative push to get people in the midst of the uncertainty to lean in and provide forward-looking forecasts," said Sabastian Niles of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz.
April 09, 2020 at 05:57 PM
4 minute read
As nearly every public company struggles with what to say about the impact of COVID-19 on the business and how to say it, two officials at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday released an unprecedented statement detailing what companies should disclose.
As most general counsel already realize, "this quarter, earnings statements and calls will not be routine," the statement said.
It urged public companies and their general counsel to disclose where the company stands today, how the company's COVID-19 response is progressing, and how its operations and financial condition may change as the fight against the virus continues. And it urged them to embrace looking forward.
"Historical information [such as comparisons with past revenues] may be relatively less significant," said the statement from Chairman Jay Clayton and corporate finance division director William Hinman. They made clear the statement represented their own views, and was not an official agency policy approved by the commission.
It also said good-faith efforts to look forward will not be second-guessed.
Deborah Meshulam, former assistant chief litigation counsel in the SEC's Enforcement Division, told Corporate Counsel on Thursday she viewed the statement as a roadmap for how public companies and regulated entities "can navigate what is an unprecedented circumstance."
Meshulam, now a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of DLA Piper, said she found interesting the two officials' tying the nation's recovery from COVID-19 to companies' willingness to file robust disclosures. "The reality is," she said, "that part of that fight and recovery from the disease will relate to our economy."
Sabastian Niles, a partner in the corporate practice at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in New York, said, "This is a clarion call to speak out … [and] an affirmative push to get people in the midst of the uncertainty to lean in and provide forward-looking forecasts, even if they will have to update them later."
Niles called the Clayton-Hinman statement unusual and groundbreaking. "I can tell you that companies are having a hard time closing their books for this quarter," he said, because of the COVID-19 disruption. "People are not sure what to do about the calls."
In light of the forecasting challenges caused by the evolving health crisis, the statement said, "It may be tempting to resort to generic, or boilerplate, disclosures that do little to inform investors of company-specific status, operational strategies and risks."
But the Clayton and Hinman urged companies not to do that. "We encourage companies and their advisers to make all reasonable efforts to convey meaningful information," they said.
The statement said robust disclosures can contribute to the nation's efforts to recover by instilling investor confidence. It also said forward-looking information is essential to any recovery.
Their statement cited as an example the owner of an industrial laundry business who might be less likely to lay off, or more likely to rehire, employees if hotel chains make public credible plans for increasing business activity.
"This type of positive dynamic plays out across our economy in countless ways," the statement said.
The two officials said they recognize that companies often limit forward-looking disclosures, and particularly specific estimates, "to those required by our rules to limit legal risk in the event the forward-looking estimates prove to be incorrect. In this regard, we encourage companies to avail themselves of the safe-harbors for forward-looking statements."
While not changing any rules or laws, the statement concluded, "We appreciate that in many cases actual financial and operational results may differ substantially from what would now appear to be reasonable estimates.
"Given the uncertainty in our current business environment, we would not expect to second guess good faith attempts to provide investors and other market participants appropriately framed forward-looking information."
Noting the interconnectivity of business, Niles said the quarterly reports in the coming weeks will be consumed by a vastly broader audience than ever before, including employees, supply-chain partners and customers as well as Main Street and institutional investors.
Niles asked, "What if every company in the next few weeks on the record includes a real statement of what they are doing to contribute and make a difference?"
He added, "These earnings calls and public releases that companies can issue in this moment of time can provide a guidepost for people."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Immigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
8 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250