In Unusual Statement, 2 SEC Officials Urge Companies to Talk About the Future
The statement ties the nation's recovery from COVID-19 to companies' willingness to file robust disclosures. "This is a clarion call to speak out ... [and] an affirmative push to get people in the midst of the uncertainty to lean in and provide forward-looking forecasts," said Sabastian Niles of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz.
April 09, 2020 at 05:57 PM
4 minute read
As nearly every public company struggles with what to say about the impact of COVID-19 on the business and how to say it, two officials at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday released an unprecedented statement detailing what companies should disclose.
As most general counsel already realize, "this quarter, earnings statements and calls will not be routine," the statement said.
It urged public companies and their general counsel to disclose where the company stands today, how the company's COVID-19 response is progressing, and how its operations and financial condition may change as the fight against the virus continues. And it urged them to embrace looking forward.
"Historical information [such as comparisons with past revenues] may be relatively less significant," said the statement from Chairman Jay Clayton and corporate finance division director William Hinman. They made clear the statement represented their own views, and was not an official agency policy approved by the commission.
It also said good-faith efforts to look forward will not be second-guessed.
Deborah Meshulam, former assistant chief litigation counsel in the SEC's Enforcement Division, told Corporate Counsel on Thursday she viewed the statement as a roadmap for how public companies and regulated entities "can navigate what is an unprecedented circumstance."
Meshulam, now a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of DLA Piper, said she found interesting the two officials' tying the nation's recovery from COVID-19 to companies' willingness to file robust disclosures. "The reality is," she said, "that part of that fight and recovery from the disease will relate to our economy."
Sabastian Niles, a partner in the corporate practice at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in New York, said, "This is a clarion call to speak out … [and] an affirmative push to get people in the midst of the uncertainty to lean in and provide forward-looking forecasts, even if they will have to update them later."
Niles called the Clayton-Hinman statement unusual and groundbreaking. "I can tell you that companies are having a hard time closing their books for this quarter," he said, because of the COVID-19 disruption. "People are not sure what to do about the calls."
In light of the forecasting challenges caused by the evolving health crisis, the statement said, "It may be tempting to resort to generic, or boilerplate, disclosures that do little to inform investors of company-specific status, operational strategies and risks."
But the Clayton and Hinman urged companies not to do that. "We encourage companies and their advisers to make all reasonable efforts to convey meaningful information," they said.
The statement said robust disclosures can contribute to the nation's efforts to recover by instilling investor confidence. It also said forward-looking information is essential to any recovery.
Their statement cited as an example the owner of an industrial laundry business who might be less likely to lay off, or more likely to rehire, employees if hotel chains make public credible plans for increasing business activity.
"This type of positive dynamic plays out across our economy in countless ways," the statement said.
The two officials said they recognize that companies often limit forward-looking disclosures, and particularly specific estimates, "to those required by our rules to limit legal risk in the event the forward-looking estimates prove to be incorrect. In this regard, we encourage companies to avail themselves of the safe-harbors for forward-looking statements."
While not changing any rules or laws, the statement concluded, "We appreciate that in many cases actual financial and operational results may differ substantially from what would now appear to be reasonable estimates.
"Given the uncertainty in our current business environment, we would not expect to second guess good faith attempts to provide investors and other market participants appropriately framed forward-looking information."
Noting the interconnectivity of business, Niles said the quarterly reports in the coming weeks will be consumed by a vastly broader audience than ever before, including employees, supply-chain partners and customers as well as Main Street and institutional investors.
Niles asked, "What if every company in the next few weeks on the record includes a real statement of what they are doing to contribute and make a difference?"
He added, "These earnings calls and public releases that companies can issue in this moment of time can provide a guidepost for people."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Testing Legal Authority, Trump Fires NLRB Member, Leaving Panel Without Quorum
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
- 2Stevens & Lee Hires Ex-Middle District of Pennsylvania U.S. Attorney as White-Collar Co-Chair
- 3Alameda Judge Ursula Jones Dickson Chosen as District Attorney
- 4'A Long 6 Years': No $150M for Goldman Sachs Investors
- 5Ex-Appellate Court Judges Launch Boutique Focused on Plaintiffs Appeals
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250