Look to CCPA for How States Will Handle Data Privacy Legislation After COVID-19
"Failure to comply will be investigated and enforced. Since that is the case, it behooves companies to focus on compliance and will put them in a better position when other bills are signed into law," Glenn Brown, of counsel at Squire Patton Boggs in Atlanta, said.
April 09, 2020 at 03:47 PM
4 minute read
The new coronavirus has forced many state legislatures to suspend their sessions or shift focus away from anticipated data privacy legislation.
"There was a significant tide of activity in many states," Glenn Brown, of counsel at Squire Patton Boggs in Atlanta, said.
New Jersey, for example, has the New Jersey Disclosure and Accountability Transparency Act floating through the Legislature, which would require a business to get consent from consumers before selling their personal data. Nevada lawmakers introduced a similar bill in February 2019, SB 220, which would prohibit the operator of a website or online service from selling consumer information if the consumer opts out of the sale of that information.
Experts say the California Consumer Privacy Act is what in-house counsel and their companies should be focusing on to prepare for what lies ahead at the state level when the pandemic is over.
"In the online space, any given state law can easily become a de facto national standard," Jim Shreve, a partner at Thompson Coburn in Chicago, said.
The CCPA requires that companies that do business in California allow consumers to opt into the collection and sale of data and provides for a private right of action over data breaches. The law applies to any company that does business in California and has personal information of a California resident. Enforcement for the CCPA is slated to begin in July despite calls from trade organizations to push the enforcement date to 2021 because of COVID-19.
"Failure to comply will be investigated and enforced. Since that is the case, it behooves companies to focus on compliance and will put them in a better position when other bills are signed into law," Brown said.
Jean-Marc Chanoine, global head of strategic accounts and legal counsel at Templafy in New York, said the CCPA can act as a good template for companies going forward.
"What you're going to find is state legislatures are going to take the CCPA and edit it. Some parts of that may become stricter and you have to be able to think ahead," Chanoine said. "You have to be able to think ahead and get the right stuff in place."
Chanoine said that since many global organizations already have remote capabilities, they should be able to prepare for data privacy laws remotely without much trouble.
What Could Be Added
In the realm of cybersecurity and data privacy, lawmakers may also have their eyes on issues that have emerged from the pandemic. Shreve said he would expect lawmakers to look at how companies are using geolocation.
"In response to the pandemic, some people have urged the geolocation tracking of those who have COVID-19. This creates potential privacy issues and state legislatures may again seek to regulate the collection and use of location data," Shreve said.
He also said lawmakers may begin looking at online services that companies are using, especially meeting applications such as Zoom, where privacy issues have arisen during the course of the pandemic.
"That can put employers and companies in a difficult position," Shreve said. "The company may not be aware that the service provider has access to their data and is not able to scrutinize them."
Shreve said he would expect states to legislate those online service providers directly rather than legislate how companies use those services.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAd Agency Legal Chief Scores $12M Golden Parachute in $13B Sale to Rival
3 minute readFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250