Look to CCPA for How States Will Handle Data Privacy Legislation After COVID-19
"Failure to comply will be investigated and enforced. Since that is the case, it behooves companies to focus on compliance and will put them in a better position when other bills are signed into law," Glenn Brown, of counsel at Squire Patton Boggs in Atlanta, said.
April 09, 2020 at 03:47 PM
4 minute read
The new coronavirus has forced many state legislatures to suspend their sessions or shift focus away from anticipated data privacy legislation.
"There was a significant tide of activity in many states," Glenn Brown, of counsel at Squire Patton Boggs in Atlanta, said.
New Jersey, for example, has the New Jersey Disclosure and Accountability Transparency Act floating through the Legislature, which would require a business to get consent from consumers before selling their personal data. Nevada lawmakers introduced a similar bill in February 2019, SB 220, which would prohibit the operator of a website or online service from selling consumer information if the consumer opts out of the sale of that information.
Experts say the California Consumer Privacy Act is what in-house counsel and their companies should be focusing on to prepare for what lies ahead at the state level when the pandemic is over.
"In the online space, any given state law can easily become a de facto national standard," Jim Shreve, a partner at Thompson Coburn in Chicago, said.
The CCPA requires that companies that do business in California allow consumers to opt into the collection and sale of data and provides for a private right of action over data breaches. The law applies to any company that does business in California and has personal information of a California resident. Enforcement for the CCPA is slated to begin in July despite calls from trade organizations to push the enforcement date to 2021 because of COVID-19.
"Failure to comply will be investigated and enforced. Since that is the case, it behooves companies to focus on compliance and will put them in a better position when other bills are signed into law," Brown said.
Jean-Marc Chanoine, global head of strategic accounts and legal counsel at Templafy in New York, said the CCPA can act as a good template for companies going forward.
"What you're going to find is state legislatures are going to take the CCPA and edit it. Some parts of that may become stricter and you have to be able to think ahead," Chanoine said. "You have to be able to think ahead and get the right stuff in place."
Chanoine said that since many global organizations already have remote capabilities, they should be able to prepare for data privacy laws remotely without much trouble.
What Could Be Added
In the realm of cybersecurity and data privacy, lawmakers may also have their eyes on issues that have emerged from the pandemic. Shreve said he would expect lawmakers to look at how companies are using geolocation.
"In response to the pandemic, some people have urged the geolocation tracking of those who have COVID-19. This creates potential privacy issues and state legislatures may again seek to regulate the collection and use of location data," Shreve said.
He also said lawmakers may begin looking at online services that companies are using, especially meeting applications such as Zoom, where privacy issues have arisen during the course of the pandemic.
"That can put employers and companies in a difficult position," Shreve said. "The company may not be aware that the service provider has access to their data and is not able to scrutinize them."
Shreve said he would expect states to legislate those online service providers directly rather than legislate how companies use those services.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHealth Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
How a 200,000-Worker Global Enterprise Took Down the Silos and Made ESG Its Mission
4 minute readCorporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250