Are Gender Pay Gaps Worse for General Counsel at the Largest Corporate Legal Departments?
At U.S.-based companies with more than $10 billion in revenue, male GCs are getting paid 40% more on average than their female counterparts, according to a new in-house compensation survey from legal recruiting firm Major, Lindsey & Africa.
April 21, 2020 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
While general counsel in the U.S. have substantially larger paychecks than their counterparts elsewhere in the world, gender pay gaps persist within corporate legal departments and the disparities are especially bad at the largest companies, according to a new report.
A global in-house counsel compensation survey that Major, Lindsey & Africa released on Tuesday shows that U.S.-based GCs and chief legal officers earn about $503,000 in average annual total cash compensation, compared with about $348,000 for GCs outside the U.S.
The report notes that the compensation difference is likely due, at least in part, to the fact that in-house leaders in the U.S. have broader roles and responsibilities than their counterparts in other jurisdictions.
The survey represents MLA's most comprehensive global study of in-house pay to date and is based on responses from 3,900 in-house lawyer participants in 36 countries. The data was collected in the fall of 2019, during precoronavirus pandemic times.
"That's one of the more meaningful things about this," said Melba Hughes, an Atlanta-based partner in MLA's in-house counsel recruiting group who co-authored the study. "When we go back and take a look at this a year from now we will be able to see data that tells us the impact of the coronavirus."
The report also highlights what appears to be a major issue at some of the largest corporations in the U.S. As a company's revenue increases, so do the pay disparities in its legal department, according to the survey.
For companies with less than $1 million in annual revenue, women GCs actually out-earned men by $388,200 to $348,889.
But the pay balance changes as a company's revenue increases.
For companies with $1 million to $10 million in revenue, the pay gap is about $14,000 in favor of male GCs. The gap increases to more than $28,000 for companies with revenues between $10 million and $100 million. At the $100 million to $1 billion revenue level, the gap grows to more than $33,000. The gap widens again to more than $98,000 at companies with $1 billion to $10 billion in revenue.
At the largest companies with more than $10 billion in revenue, the gender pay disparity leaps. While male GCs at these businesses average $1,112,989 in total cash compensation, their female counterparts average $739,436. That's a pay difference of more than 40%.
The finding surprised Hughes, the MLA partner. She noted that the discrepancies appear to be connected to bonuses more than base salaries.
"Oftentimes companies will have a range of bonuses. I think there's a lot of discretion in a bonus award. My guess is there are some biases being entered into that analysis for the bonus portion of compensation," she said.
Other findings include:
- Nearly two-thirds of the 1,419 CLO and GC respondents who answered the gender pay question in the survey were male.
- While pay disparities are pronounced at top in-house positions, U.S.-based females in midlevel positions, such as regional general counsel and associate or deputy general counsel, reported higher total actual cash compensation than their male counterparts.
- Asia-Pacific is bucking the GC pay gap trend. The region's female GCs reported average total actual cash compensation of $437,429, while male GCs reported earning $385,884 on average. The report notes that in Asia "many households have helpers who look after children so women can return to work sooner than they do in other countries."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAd Agency Legal Chief Scores $12M Golden Parachute in $13B Sale to Rival
3 minute readFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250