Why (and How) Public Companies and Traders Should Prepare for Regulatory Scrutiny Post-COVID-19
Once working conditions revert back to their "normal" state, it is likely that regulatory inquiries and investigations into potential misconduct during the days of remote working will emerge. Publicly-listed U.S. companies and traders should take steps today in preparation for the regulatory scrutiny of tomorrow.
April 22, 2020 at 04:12 PM
7 minute read
In the wake of market disruptions triggered by COVID-19, major U.S. government and regulatory enforcement agencies—including the Department of Justice (DOJ), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)—have begun highlighting potential legal risks to public companies and traders surrounding major shifts to our working landscape, including the temporary "new normal" of remote working. Current social distancing realities mean employees are working from home and, therefore, outside the traditional modes of oversight and supervision.
Once (and possibly even before) working conditions revert back to their "normal" state, it is likely that regulatory inquiries and investigations into potential misconduct during the days of remote working will emerge. Publicly-listed U.S. companies and traders should take steps today in preparation for the regulatory scrutiny of tomorrow.
|A Window Into Potential Regulatory Investigations
Recent communications from enforcers and regulators provide insight into what kinds of investigations they may pursue in the coming months. On March 16, U.S. Attorney General William Barr directed all U.S. Attorneys "to prioritize the detection, investigation, and prosecution of all criminal conduct related to the current pandemic." Already there have been investigations and prosecutions stemming from fraudulent provision of goods and services related to COVID-19, and the numbers will only grow as massive amounts of money are distributed by governments, development banks, and NGOs in response to this health and economic crisis.
The SEC released a statement in March reminding public companies to stay vigilant about insider trading as the pandemic continues to impact markets in unprecedented ways. Corporate insiders are gaining access to material nonpublic information of potentially much greater value than is typical, related to government relief and other COVID-19 impacts, and this information may be shared with a far broader audience, extending to lower level employees as well as consultants and outside professionals, in a company's efforts to respond quickly. The risks increase with the SEC extending the time for companies to file their financial disclosures, while the challenges of overseeing dissemination of such information are compounded by the remote working environment.
Insider trading is not the only concern. The SEC recently suspended trading for 11 companies, citing concerns of fraud related to COVID-19, and posted an investor alert about COVID-19 related scams. Indeed, public companies should expect any public announcements related to COVID to receive increased scrutiny from regulatory enforcers. Similarly, regulators can be expected to carefully examine financial statements, given the pressures facing companies during economic downturns, to demonstrate financial well-being.
Traders also face regulatory impacts from COVID. To accommodate mandatory telework, the CFTC has issued a series of "no action" letters designed to provide relief for futures commission merchants, swap dealers, floor brokers, and retail foreign exchange dealers from recording requirements for communications related to voice trading and time-stamp requirements. The CFTC has also issued 30-day extensions of filing deadlines for swap dealers and futures commission merchants to furnish annual compliance reports. While the relaxing of certain controls may suggest a more permissive regulatory environment, traders should be aware that the CFTC has made clear it is on high alert for those seeking to profit from market volatility related to COVID-19.
The DOJ is acting quickly to arrest COVID fraud perpetrators on criminal complaints, while physical convening of grand juries is largely on hold. Despite temporary suspension of onsite visits, the SEC and CFTC are continuing their examination and inspection programs, requiring prompt production of records and written responses, and actively conducting telephonic and video interviews. And with an anticipated surge in company layoffs due to the COVID-triggered downturn, conditions are ripe for a corresponding increase in whistleblower actions as terminated employees seek to benefit from the SEC and CFTC whistleblower programs.
|Developing Defenses Today for Tomorrow's Investigations
Given the circumstances described above, companies, traders, and their counsel should anticipate an uptick in regulatory inquiries over the coming months. Companies and traders will want to take the following steps to mitigate possible risks and prepare for possible visits by regulators and law enforcement.
(1) Undertake an immediate comprehensive risk assessment. Corporations should accelerate the timing of their next risk assessment, including:
- Identifying the company's risk profile with an eye toward the current, COVID-influenced regulatory environment.
- Augmenting controls and training to respond to those risks. To be effective, this risk assessment should involve executives and business function leaders to weigh in and understand possible resulting dangers.
(2) Leverage technology to address risks. Especially with most employees working remotely by computer, technology can be used in service of compliance. For example:
- Computer-delivered training can be updated to address key risks (like insider trading) and sent to targeted audiences. Technology can also be used to better track attendance.
- Controls can be further automated to capture possible violations, especially as many employees now must complete deals and transactions by computer.
- Whistleblower portals should be enhanced to ensure that all employees have online access to report possible violations easily and anonymously.
- Now might be the time for companies to seriously consider the use of predictive analytics. Online systems used to gather and aggregate data enable early flagging of suspicious expenses, irregular patterns, and other indicia of potentially fraudulent activities.
(3) Prepare for regulators/investigators. Corporations should also get ready to respond if regulators come knocking by:
- Tracking and being able to demonstrate all of their steps to mitigate against fraud, insider trading, and other risks posed by the pandemic. Exploiting technology as described above will support this effort.
- Updating protocols so that employees understand how to respond, including involving in-house attorneys at the soonest possible opportunity.
- Considering creative strategies to respond. While quick and comprehensive cooperation is often the preferred path, in certain circumstances overly aggressive enforcement tactics—for instance, subpoenas arising out of legally questionable allegations of market manipulation—may warrant more adversarial, aggressive, and innovative responses.
- Engaging outside counsel with U.S. prosecutorial and enforcement experience who are willing and able to take aggressive positions against regulators, should that be in the company's best interest.
While the exact scope of inquiries and investigations from U.S. regulators in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic remains to be seen, public companies and traders can and should take proactive steps to mitigate the risks of attracting the wrong kind of regulatory attention.
Scott Hulsey is a lawyer with Kobre & Kim in Washington, D.C. He is a former high-ranking Department of Justice official and corporate Chief Compliance Officer who serves as counsel in white-collar criminal and regulatory enforcement matters. William F. McGovern is a lawyer with Kobre & Kim in New York. His practice focuses on high-stakes cross-border government enforcement and investigation matters, with a particular emphasis on matters with an Asia nexus. Benjamin Sauter is a lawyer with Kobre & Kim in New York. He focuses on cutting-edge financial products and services disputes. Hartley M.K. West is a lawyer with Kobre & Kim in San Francisco. She's a trial lawyer with extensive experience in white-collar criminal and asset forfeiture matters.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250