Overseeing AI Implementation? Here's a Checklist for General Counsel
"The purpose of the checklist is that it serves as a starting point for GCs to determine what kind of questions they need to ask to proceed with implementing artificial intelligence," Jenny Karlsson, the North American head of global markets at Lex Mundi in Houston, told Corporate Counsel.
April 27, 2020 at 05:03 PM
3 minute read
With the increased use in artificial intelligence, general counsel and chief legal officers are being asked to oversee their employer's implementation of the technology without a template on what kinds of questions they need to be asking.
Now, Lex Mundi, with the help of Cambrian Futures and Morrison & Foerster, has published a checklist to give legal department leaders a starting point.
Jenny Karlsson, the North American head of global markets at Lex Mundi in Houston, told Corporate Counsel that during a conference in 2019, general counsel in a variety of industries expressed concern over how to manage the launch of the technology.
"The purpose of the checklist is that it serves as a starting point for GCs to determine what kind of questions they need to ask to proceed with implementing artificial intelligence," Karlsson said.
Karlsson noted that she expects the checklist will be tailored to suit each individual organization's needs and that it is not meant for one size fits all.
The items on the checklist are governance, compliance, test, audit and evolve, training, and institution building. She said she would expect GCs to change parts of the checklist based on their industry and how they plan on using artificial intelligence, however, she said all GCs should put a greater focus on governance.
"Based on the responses we've received from general counsel, governance seems to be one of the greatest challenges," Karlsson said.
That would include making sure that there is training throughout the company on how to properly use the technology, making sure ethics on the use of AI is taught throughout the organization. Karlsson explained that governance can help general counsel find ways to best protect the company surrounding its use of artificial intelligence.
Generally speaking, some of the liability issues the GCs need to be aware of when their company implements artificial intelligence include bias, how it is used when recruiting and hiring prospective employees and being aware of vendor issues. Karlsson said knowing there is a structure to oversee those risks will give general counsel a better idea of how to protect the company legally.
Karlsson said that artificial intelligence technology has moved largely moved beyond skepticism and she would expect more companies to implement it in the near future. As employees continue working from home, companies will need to use artificial intelligence to streamline work processes, she said.
"I think artificial intelligence will become more important in the environment that we find ourselves in," Karlsson said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Judge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
7 minute readCSX Joins Rest of Big Four Railroad Companies in Installing New Generation of Legal Leadership
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Eckert Seamans Sues Former Client Over $300K in Unpaid Legal Fees
- 2Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
- 3Ben & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
- 4Gold Medal Grift? Caitlyn Jenner Accused in Crypto Fraud Scheme
- 5Jay Clayton, Ex-SEC Chief and Sullivan & Cromwell Lawyer, Eyed For Manhattan US Attorney's Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250