A Lesson From COVID-19: Why Wait for a Crisis To Begin Managing It?
To avoid the wrath now reserved for our elected leaders, company chiefs must be able to answer the following questions: In the face of a brewing mess that may be played out in public, when should crisis management begin (short answer, yesterday), and who should they turn to handle corporate calamities (well, it depends on severity)?
April 28, 2020 at 01:51 PM
5 minute read
Before COVID-19 took over the 24/7 news cycle, public relations nightmares à la Boeing, WeWork, and Theranos were fodder for the type of headlines the business world feared most. Rather than the word "coronavirus," it was phrases like "whistleblower complaint" and "data breach" that sent shudders down the spines of corporate boards and C-suites from coast-to-coast.
While the current pandemic is sure to dominate our collective headspace for the foreseeable future, corporate PR debacles of the "ordinary" kind—read: fraud, shareholder disputes, employment and #MeToo issues, etc.—will regain their place in the news before we know it. Until then, there is a lot to be learned from certain of our federal and state governments that have been caught seemingly flat-footed by—and in some cases unprepared for—our current health care and economic disaster. The most basic lesson: Advanced crisis management planning, stress testing, and strategy are critical for any entity that could find itself staring down the barrel of a catastrophe, no matter the scale.
To avoid the wrath now reserved for our elected leaders, company chiefs must be able to answer the following questions: In the face of a brewing mess that may be played out in public, when should crisis management begin (short answer, yesterday), and who should they turn to handle corporate calamities (well, it depends on severity)?
|Crisis Management Methods, Old and New
Traditionally, crisis management is set into motion after the hint of an issue, be it sexually inappropriate conduct by someone in management, a product recall, company-wide fraud, or financial misconduct at the C-suite or board level. And when such a predicament is discovered—or worse, made public—what do corporations do? They react.
Many companies, to their credit, solve for problems that rise to the level of a crisis by initiating investigations. But they do so on their heels, all the while absorbing the blows that come along with adverse publicity (and never really knowing exactly what is in front of them) pending the completion of internal inquiries. Until then, the damage is done in the form of hits to a business's reputation, the morale of its workforce, and oftentimes—and most painfully—its revenue. There is a smarter way.
As the outbreak of COVID-19 has made abundantly clear, it is simply not necessary, nor is it ideal, to wait for a crisis to plan for its solution. This old-fashioned approach puts entities that are unprepared in a needlessly defensive posture. Instead, companies should proactively build response plans before ending up face-to-face with a developing catastrophe. By employing this more preemptive take on crisis management, businesses can get ahead of potentially devastating narratives and better manage inevitable collateral damage.
|The Crisis Management A-Team
When it comes to run-of-the-mill operational problems—say, fairly benign supply chain disruptions, market uncertainty, or management retention and turnover issues—board oversight and C-suite intervention is ordinarily sufficient to quell lingering concerns. But for next-level corporate trauma, like cyber attacks, environmental disasters, executive controversy, and social media backlash, crisis management will likely be required. And as was the case with the risk of a global pandemic that should have been flashing red on our government's radar screen, these are among the universe of conditions that companies should plan for in advance. That is not enough—the right team must be assembled to do the necessary planning.
Position players on a corporation's crisis management lineup should include communications experts, PR specialists, and financial advisors. Quarterbacking the group should be independent outside counsel who not only understands the company's business and operations, but also is trusted by internal stakeholders. Indeed, crisis management planning should be framed through a legal lens because the byproduct of most every corporate train wreck is exposure to liability.
Together, these professionals can work to foresee situations and events that could knock a company off its axis. With this information in hand, they are equipped to then compile response and risk mitigation strategies tailored to particular occurrences, but all geared to preserve a business's good will, reputation, and revenue, while shielding it from legal liability to the extent possible. And when an actual full-blown crisis comes to pass, the crisis management A-team—one that has a preexisting working relationship and can cooperatively control a given situation—can spring into action, having anticipated (at least within the margins) the scope and nuances of the fiasco at hand, with the appropriate response at the ready.
By attacking crisis management in such a forward-looking manner—with a designated band of legal, comms, PR, and financial pros reporting to company's officers and directors and prepared to act on behalf of a corporation under siege—management is freed up to do what it does best: run the business so it can remain viable—and even thrive—despite any crisis in its midst.
Seth Darmstadter is a member of Michelman & Robinson, and managing partner of the national law firm's Chicago office. An experienced and accomplished commercial litigator, Seth is also a crisis management specialist, having guided companies, large and small, through tumultuous and business-threatening events. He can be contacted at 312-706-7746 or [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInfluencers Putting Companies on Hot Seat by Demanding 'Reverse' Morals Clauses
8 minute readWhy Seemingly Simple Off-Channel Communication Rules Still Vex Finance Industry
5 minute readFTC Decries Social Media Platforms' 'Vast Surveillance' of Users
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250