In-House Counsel: Prosecutors Won't Overlook Remote Wrongdoing in COVID-19 Times
Two things are certain even during these challenging times: corporate and employee wrongdoing will not stop; and the Department of Justice (DOJ) and state prosecutors will be even more alert for and will continue to investigate wrongdoing.
April 30, 2020 at 01:23 PM
6 minute read
With many employees working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic due to government-mandated office closures and workplace safety concerns, in-house attorneys are facing a multitude of unprecedented challenges. Among them are the difficulties of being unable to observe and interact with employees in person. There is a potential that remote working and the current economic challenges faced by businesses and their employees may lead to an increase in corporate malfeasance or misconduct by employees that could be attributed to the company. Two things are certain even during these challenging times: corporate and employee wrongdoing will not stop; and the Department of Justice (DOJ) and state prosecutors will be even more alert for and will continue to investigate wrongdoing.
Below are some suggestions for in-house counsel to consider to help prevent or detect malfeasance and position themselves to be prepared if and when their company faces a government inquiry.
|Implement and Update Internal Procedures
Whether a company has adequate internal procedures to detect or prevent wrongdoing is a key factor prosecutors and regulators will focus on during a criminal investigation or other enforcement action, particularly in an era of remote work arrangements. If an organization does not have internal compliance controls in place to address and discourage potential misconduct, such as integrity hotlines, these should be developed and adopted as soon as possible. Even companies that have a comprehensive compliance program should review and update the program, especially to address the additional risks and pitfalls that may arise from the remote working environment. After businesses reopen, companies should be sure to add any updated procedures developed during the COVID-19 pandemic to their policies, including disaster management plans, so they are prepared for the next crisis.
|Communicate With employees
A vital part of operating a remote workforce is maintaining open lines of communication—even to the point of overcommunicating—not only to prevent employees from feeling isolated, but to also encourage them to remain productive and to continue to be vigilant for security or compliance issues that may arise in the remote work setting. It would also be useful to remind employees of their continuing duty to report any information they may obtain regarding potential malfeasance. Maintaining a strong corporate culture requires transparent communication from an organization's top leaders. In addition to deterring wrongdoing, many employees will appreciate working for a company with strong values. In-house attorneys should remind staff that all policies and procedures remain in effect even when they are working remotely. Frequent communication with employees is also a way of bringing the "office" and the values of the company into the employee's home, which is another strong reminder that all the rules are still in place, even during remote working. In other words, adequate communication can help deter any impression that management is taking a laissez-faire attitude toward compliance and ethics.
|Conduct Internal Investigations Virtually
Conducting an internal investigation when a company becomes aware of potential misconduct is crucial for two main reasons. First, it is important for a company to understand what led to the alleged misconduct and take immediate steps to fix the problem and prevent similar issues in the future. Second, when deciding how to resolve a case, the DOJ and other governmental agencies place a strong emphasis on whether the company conducted an internal investigation, the findings of that investigation, and the remedial measures that were implemented as a result of the investigation. Therefore, a company that has conducted an internal investigation will be better positioned to deal with prosecutors and regulators.
It is unlikely that working conditions will be returning to a pre-COVID-19 "normal" any time soon. Therefore, when a company discovers that something is amiss, it should conduct any internal investigations virtually rather than waiting for business to return to "normal." In-house counsel should also move away from the mindset that the only way to conduct investigations is in person. The preference for in-person investigations is understandable and remains the best option. But, waiting for weeks or months to conduct an investigation may further exacerbate the underlying issues that gave rise to the misconduct or problems. Such delay could put the company at a disadvantage if government authorities get involved. As most of us have experienced in recent weeks, advances in technology have made it easier to conduct virtual meetings and should be used to conduct virtual internal investigations. Documents, including emails and chats, can be collected, reviewed, and shared remotely. Likewise, interviews can be conducted via videoconference on a secure platform. While virtual interviews may be a little slower, with experienced counsel and the proper technology, virtual internal investigations can be effective. One key consideration is only using virtual technology that provides adequate cybersecurity protections to ensure that confidentiality, including attorney-client privilege, is maintained.
|Conclusion
It is critical for companies to have updated compliance programs that address remote working conditions to help mitigate wrongdoing. Similarly, waiting to conduct an internal investigation until your company is back in the office could be a mistake because of the uncertainty surrounding how long government restrictions will remain in effect. A delay of many months, or even weeks, could allow small problems to grow into bigger problems. Memories also fade the longer a problem is not investigated. One should not assume that prosecutors, who are also working remotely, will show much leniency if in-house attorneys neglect to address known issues in any environment. Being proactive now can position your company to be ready if law enforcement shows up in your company's lobby after businesses reopen.
Inbal P. Garrity and Rither Alabre are partners in the New York office of Blank Rome. Garrity concentrates her practice in the areas of white-collar criminal defense, investigations, and complex corporate and commercial litigation. Alabre, a former prosecutor and federal law clerk, concentrates his practice in the areas of white collar defense and investigations and complex commercial and corporate litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250