Why Commercial Tenants, Property Owners Should Be Cautious When Seeking Rent, Mortgage Relief
A growing number of retailers, restaurants and other businesses are skipping payments to malls and office buildings in recent weeks as COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders shut down operations. But there can be pitfalls for businesses and property owners beyond the obvious ones for not paying the rent or the mortgage.
April 30, 2020 at 11:15 AM
6 minute read
With the COVID-19 pandemic dealing crushing blows to retailers, restaurants and other businesses and their commercial real estate landlords, attorneys warn that skipping rent or mortgage payments could lead to other legal complications beyond the obvious.
More and more retailers and restaurants, as well as other businesses, have skipped payments to malls and office buildings recently as COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders shut down operations. Cheesecake Factory and Urban Outfitters are among the large chains that announced they did not pay the April rent during shutdown orders, according to news reports.
Commercial property researchers at Green Street Advisors said owners of 30,000 strip malls in the U.S. have been paid only between 30% and 50% of April rent, according to the Financial Times.
Many commercial property landlords are aware of their tenants' difficulties and are being flexible with distressed occupants, the attorneys said. But many cash-strapped tenants are also accepting the risks of not paying the rent, one real estate attorney said.
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson real estate partner Meyer Last, who is based in New York and represents commercial real estate owners and lessees, said on Wednesday, "The vast majority of retail tenants are not paying rent. Banks and pharmacies and a few very well-financed retailers are paying rent. But three-quarters of retail tenants are not. In the office world, it is reversed. About three-quarters of tenants are paying rent and a small percentage are not.
"The two worlds are very different," he continued. "For the most part, neither office tenants nor retail tenants have the right under their lease to not pay rent. Most tenants under these circumstances have to pay their rent. The retailers are engaged in self-preservation, which right now means cash preservation. They don't have the cash to pay those rents."
Bonnie Hochman Rothell, a partner and chairwoman of the litigation practice at Morris, Manning & Martin in Washington, D.C., said in-house counsel for commercial real estate tenants should be mindful that tenants who withhold rent could face several repercussions beyond the obvious ones.
She said, for example, if they are getting funding under the CARES Act, the COVID-19 federal relief package, "if they are a small business that receives a PPP [Paycheck Protection Program] loan, it can be excused if they use the money to pay rent. The value of the stimulus is to enable that," she said. But "if they take the loan and then don't pay rent, it could prevent them from having the loan forgiven down the road."
"If establishments get the loan, they should be able to pay the rent in the short term and have time to work something more amicable out with their landlord," she said. "And they could end up with claims against them from their business investors and business owners if they don't have the proper consents."
Hochman Rothell said businesses might be better off negotiating a reduced rent for the entire year rather than not paying any rent in the short term. The business could be leaving its lease guarantors exposed if it forgoes paying rent, and the commercial landlord could go after the guarantor on the lease, which could be one of the business' owners, particularly in small businesses. "There could be an unintentional exposure if the guarantor gets sued by the landlord," she said.
But Last said that's a risk some distressed businesses are willing to take. "Yes, there can be consequences to not making a rent payment or a mortgage payment. In nearly all the cases I am dealing with the factors that are pushing people to not make the payments generally override the other consequences," he said.
And he said, "Generally speaking, retail and office, we, for the most part, have been counseling our clients not to send default notices to their tenants who don't pay rent because they know tenants are not in a position to do anything different. People have been avoiding creating situations that make it difficult to crawl out of."
Considerations for landlords and their own mortgages
Hochman Rothell said in-house counsel for commercial real estate landlords who have their own mortgages to pay also should be cautious about requesting relief for mortgage payments so as not to seemingly admit they're unable to pay their debts.
Other investors and loans could be affected by that type of admission, she said. She warned that "such an admission may enable a contract counterparty to terminate the agreement or remove a manager or general partner from their managerial and oversight positions—with potential loss of economic rights, such as a promoted interest, incident to such removal."
"You want to make sure that in seeking forbearance you are not making an admission that might adversely affect a guarantor or joint venture's rights or trigger an exit remedy," she said. "A small to midsize company with a joint venture agreement with a subordinate loan, you might need to make sure that you are not triggering something."
Asking for forbearance in one loan might trigger a default on a subordinate loan, for instance, she said.
"You have to look at the entire deal structure to make sure that solving one problem does not create another, such as creating a secondary default, or trigger an investor's exit rights if the entity doesn't maintain its obligations in a timely manner," Hochman Rothell said. "Rental and mortgage forbearances can't be looked at in a vacuum. Look at all the documentation to make sure you are not causing a problem on some other end of your deal."
Another reason that the entire corporate structure and loan documents have to be examined is to make sure that the proper consents are obtained, such as investor or board consent. "You have to make sure that you have the appropriate consents to take action," she said.
"All in all there are two takeaways: Know your deal structure and corporate documents and know your rental agreement, so you know the facts of your particular case, and negotiate rather than take matters in your own hands," Hochman Rothell said. "Nine times out of 10 you will be better off with a long-term perspective in mind rather than a short-term, not thought-through approach."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
Ex-Cancer Society CLO Takes Legal Reins of Habitat for Humanity International
3 minute readGCs Face Peril as Foreign Bribery Probes Second-Guess 'Routine' Advice
CLO of Realtor Group Exits After Stinging Court Defeat, Internal Turmoil
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250