Advocacy Groups Ask FTC to Reinvestigate TikTok Over Alleged COPPA Violations
"TikTok has not obtained parental consent for these accounts. Contrary to the terms of the consent decree, TikTok fails to make reasonable efforts to ensure that a parent of a child receives direct notice of its practices regarding the collection, use, or disclosure of personal information," the current complaint against TikTok states.
May 14, 2020 at 04:55 PM
4 minute read
A coalition of consumer, privacy and children's advocacy groups filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission this week claiming TikTok has not deleted the personal information of users under 13 in defiance of a consent decree the company came to with the agency in 2019.
The complaint, led by the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood and the Center for Digital Democracy, claims the social media company still has the personal information of users 13 years old and younger that date back to accounts created as early as 2016.
On Feb. 27, 2019, the FTC filed a complaint against TikTok, previously known as Musical.ly, claiming the company violated the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA. The FTC noted that the age, birth date and school information for users under 13 was available for anyone to see.
TikTok settled with the FTC and, according to the consent decree, the agency fined TikTok $5.7 million. It also gave the company the choice of deleting either the personal information of all users or deleting just the personal information of all users under the age of 13. The FTC also required TikTok to obtain parental consent before collecting personal information from children.
"TikTok has not obtained parental consent for these accounts. Contrary to the terms of the consent decree, TikTok fails to make reasonable efforts to ensure that a parent of a child receives direct notice of its practices regarding the collection, use, or disclosure of personal information," the current complaint against the company states.
Michael Rosenbloom, a fellow at thee Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, D.C., who helped file the complaint, said in an interview Thursday the groups began investigating how TikTok was complying with the consent decree last summer. He explained the groups created accounts with birth dates for users who would be 13 years old or younger to see what would happen. The organizations found TikTok did not direct them to get parental permission before offering personal information. Rosenbloom said the organizations have not appealed to TikTok directly but have not ruled out doing so.
"The consent decree asked them to stop violating COPPA and delete the information they held on users under 13. They haven't successfully done either of those things," Rosenbloom explained.
The Campaign for Commercial-Free Childhood and the Center for Digital Democracy are asking the FTC to penalize TikTok $41,484 per violation of COPPA. They are also asking the FTC to enjoin the company from registering new users until it adopts a method for determining the ages of its users and becomes fully compliant with COPPA.
"That sounds extreme, but the point is to get them to come into compliance," Rosenbloom said.
Outside of privacy issues, TikTok has been accused by American politicians of being a threat to national security. Last October, Sens. Tom Cotton and Chuck Schumer wrote a letter to Joseph Maguire, the director of national intelligence, asking the intelligence agency to conduct an assessment of the national security risks posed by TikTok.
In January, TikTok announced the hiring of Erich Andersen as its first global general counsel. At the time, the company indicated the hiring was made to bolster its compliance and intellectual property efforts.
A spokesperson for TikTok did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250