Post-COVID-19: What to Expect in the 'Next Normal'
The "new normal" has become a household phrase, not only because we are all stuck working from home, but because it seeks to identify the ways in which we work, interact, and conduct business in the middle of a global pandemic. But what will the "next normal" look like?
May 14, 2020 at 01:12 PM
7 minute read
The "new normal" has become a household phrase, not only because we are all stuck working from home, but because it seeks to identify the ways in which we work, interact, and conduct business in the middle of a global pandemic. But what will the "next normal" look like? What will be the impact of the legal and operational decisions that are made now, in the middle of this crisis? What should we expect in the next normal?
The post-COVID-19 world for many companies, particularly in the short term, will necessarily focus on productivity and value. Legal departments will be asked to do more with less − to find ways, via technology, forward-thinking and prioritization, to manage enterprise risk and legal needs more effectively and efficiently. At the same time, the human and economic impacts of COVID-19 are creating novel legal work beyond the ordinary course. The ability to anticipate the consequences of these issues, and to start thinking now about solutions, will be critically important to mitigating future risks and paving a way out of this economic deep freeze.
Based on an informal survey of some of the largest companies and most influential global business leaders, here are some of the issues that are front of mind as we look forward to the next normal:
- Investment opportunities – The economic disruption we are experiencing will result in significant investment opportunities for virtually all asset classes. Some examples include take-private transactions; sale-leaseback opportunities; and distressed debt. There also is a lot of investment capital (so-called dry powder) in the market, and several firms already have announced their intention to be buyers. Early stages of this crisis will be marked by Section 363 sales as sponsors look to sell underperforming private equity companies. And Congress is considering a $1 trillion infrastructure expenditure, which will open up investment opportunities in technology, health, airports, water and waste water facilities.
- Investigations – As the current crisis subsides, there will be allegations of abuse or non-compliance across industries. Federal and state authorities will be forced to actively investigate abuses, fraud, and other misconduct. Companies must be vigilant in their compliance efforts, but be prepared to defend their conduct once the investigations start.
- Taxation – The federal government's emergency measures during this pandemic are likely to add $5 to $10 trillion to a national debt that was already nearly $25 trillion. Add to this a potential rise in interest rates and the enormous pressure to pay down the debt. The government will likely respond through changes to the current system and/or by adding a federal VAT or national sales tax. States also will feel the heat to raise taxes. Proactive tax planning, including scenario planning, now, will be critical.
- Privacy, security and information sharing – Companies will have to face a number of information-related issues in the aftermath of this crisis. First and foremost will be how privacy impacts the public and private sector's ability to track the virus as it inevitability reappears. Companies also will face increasing security threats as criminals attempt to take advantage of the crisis. Apart from privacy, companies will also need to create strategies to share information among themselves, as well as with the public sector. Security issues will also be critical as the supply chain inevitably changes.
- Supply chain and the US onshore movement – This pandemic has brought renewed focus on the source of the American supply chain. Policymakers will challenge the notions of lean manufacturing, offshoring, and outsourcing. Most vulnerable will be companies that rely heavily on China for parts and materials. Proposals already in play would require certain products in the medical supply chain to be produced in the US and would create federally backed low-interest financing or tax breaks for capital expenditures that would bring jobs onshore. Finally, expect to see US counter-measures aimed at slowing China's global growth.
- The next generation board room – The pandemic is the latest threat fueling the potential for deglobalization, nationalist movements, and major shifts in global supply chains and the global economy as we know it. This perfect storm likely will accelerate the adoption of digital strategies (ie, digital transformation) to counter these threats and remain competitive in this time of crisis as well as shine a new light on corporate resiliency practices. Directors and officers will face increasing pressures from shareholders, investors and the markets generally to shore up their defenses and prepare for the next normal.
- Legislative support – As occurred after 9/11, Congress is considering prospective measures to protect businesses that suffer losses due to the pandemic. States are looking at similar legislation. These measures are being considered while litigation over the insurability of such damages is ramping up. It will be critical for companies to closely monitor developments in this important area. Being proactive in monitoring, proposing and advocating for or against legislation that will materially impact the business will be critical.
- Post-COVID-19 health check – Many companies are making critical operational and legal decisions that often are reactive to a crisis that they did not expect. Many of these decisions, while appropriate in the midst of a global pandemic, may not be in the long-term best interest of the company. Operations, legal and compliance should be planning now to perform a post-COVID-19 health check of the business. There will certainly be changes to how legal and compliance, in particular, work going forward.
- Litigation – Many studies are predicting that post-COVID-19 litigation will explode for companies, whether it is commercial contract disputes, insurance coverage, product liability/negligence, or securities and consumer class actions. Each company should evaluate its potential litigation risk by looking both at its own risk portfolio and across its industry, as well as looking backwards to litigation spikes following other crises. Bucketing different types of litigation and identifying law firms now to get up to speed and prepare for coming litigation will save money and reduce risk later.
Being prepared for the next normal will require vigilance, creativity, imagination and hard work. The ability to anticipate and plan for issues that will most directly affect your business will be what separates those businesses that survive this crisis from those that don't.
John Gilluly is the Global Co-Chair of DLA Piper's Corporate Group. John is also a member of DLA Piper's Global Board and its Executive Committee. John represents clients across a range of industries and focuses on capital markets transactions, SEC reporting and compliance, mergers and acquisitions, private equity and venture capital transactions, and corporate governance matters. Brett Ingerman is Managing Partner of the Baltimore Office and the Global Co-Chairman of the Compliance and Governance Practice. Brett Ingerman's primary areas of practice are business and commercial and insurance litigation and arbitration, with a focus on complex commercial and insurance disputes. Kathy Ruhland holds the following firm Leadership positions: Steering Committee, Global Alignment and Integration; Co-Chair, Consumer Goods sub-sector; Co-Chair, Global Leadership Alliance for Woman (LAW); Member of DLA Piper's governing Policy Committee and advises clients on cross-border transactions, including global M&A, restructuring and joint ventures, in established and emerging markets throughout the world. Stasia Kelly is the Executive Director of Client Relations and is a member of the firm's Global Board and Executive Committee. Stasia has extensive experience as both outside counsel and as a general counsel and brings these perspectives to her practice, working closely with boards of directors, general counsel and in-house legal teams, helping clients design and implement effective governance and compliance programs. Stasia also advises boards and executives on crisis management.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
8 minute readSteward Health CEO Saga Signals Escalation of Coercive Congressional Oversight Against Private Parties
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Del. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 2Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
- 3Bridge the Communication Gap: The Benefits of Having (and Being) a Bilingual Mediator
- 4CFIUS Is Locked and Loaded, but What Lies Ahead for CFIUS Enforcement Activity?
- 5Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250