Pharma Firm General Counsel on How Risk, Flexibility Delivered 'Home Run' With COVID-19 Drug
"Lawyers, in my personal view and to over-generalize, can be a little too risk-averse," said Ligand's longtime general counsel, Charles Berkman.
May 15, 2020 at 01:36 PM
4 minute read
Being flexible while having a healthy appetite for risk appears to be paying off for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc., a San Diego-based firm that licenses and supplies Captisol, a crucial ingredient in experimental COVID-19 treatment drug remdesivir.
"Lawyers, in my personal view and to over-generalize, can be a little too risk-averse," said Ligand's longtime general counsel, Charles Berkman.
"But it's more about flexibility than risk-taking," he added. "We're very diversified. … So on any one business transaction we may be willing to be more flexible or take more risks than the typical biotech that might be completely focused on one or two products or projects."
Captisol, which Berkman describes as a patented "fancy sugar," allows the human body to absorb drugs, essentially acting as a delivery agent.
"Our partner has the active pharmaceutical ingredient, but it just wouldn't be effective without Captisol," Berkman said. "It's got a big, long and successful safety record."
In 2015, Ligand, which receives royalties from licensees, entered into an agreement with Gilead Sciences Inc. At the time, the pharma giant was developing remdesivir to treat Ebola. And the partnership seemed promising at first, though hopes fizzled as the drug has yet to gain approval from the Food and Drug Administration.
"The initial outcome looked like we struck out," said Berkman, who joined Ligand in 2001 as associate general counsel and chief patent counsel following a stint in Big Law at Baker & McKenzie.
But remdesivir got a second life May 1, when the FDA authorized the drug for emergency use for COVID-19 patients, delivering what Berkman said "looks like a home run at this point" for Ligand and Gilead. An attempt to speak with Gilead general counsel Brett Pletcher was unsuccessful.
"It's interesting when you look at the timeline of this," Berkman said. "You can't get disappointed too early in this industry. Things have a way of coming around if you're patient enough."
Ligand's business model is built on a diverse portfolio of pharma products and more than 100 licensing partnerships with some of the biggest firms in the industry, including Novartis International AG, Merck & Co. Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline.
"That's how the company markets itself in the financial world, as having a shots-on-goal business model," said Hayden Trubitt, a shareholder at Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth who has served as Ligand's outside counsel for years.
Trubitt represented the company in 2011 during its $35.5 million acquisition of CyDex Pharmaceuticals Inc., which had the license for Captisol. He also was involved in Ligand's licensing and supply agreement with Gilead.
"It's understood when you build a company with literally hundreds of shots on goal that most of them will be either zeros or not much. But a few will be home runs," he said. "It's an interesting business model and that's how the company plays its game."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllProf's Stinging Conclusion: Lawyers for Purdue Pharma Were 'Overzealous Accomplices in Corporate Misconduct'
6 minute readSage Therapeutics Axes GC After Drug-Pipeline Failures Force Cost-Cutting
After Guiding Illumina Through Harrowing Merger Fight, GC Charles Dadswell to Depart
Ex-Lucid, Tesla Legal Leader Joins Gene Therapy Startup With IPO Ambitions
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Rollercoaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
- 3Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
- 4Elections Have Consequences: Some Thoughts on Labor and Employment Law Topics in 2025 and Beyond
- 5Law Firm Associates, Staffers Continue to Put a Premium On Workplace Flexibility, Study Finds
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250