Are In-House Counsel Ready to Start Attending Educational Events Again?
Of the 405 ACC randomly selected members who responded to an online flash poll in early May, nearly 45% said they'd go to educational or training events—but only if health safety measures are being enforced.
May 18, 2020 at 02:21 PM
3 minute read
As parts of the world begin to reopen amid the coronavirus pandemic, many in-house lawyers are cautious but willing, under certain circumstances, to venture outside for continuing legal education and training, according to the latest COVID-19 member flash poll from the Association of Corporate Counsel.
Of the 405 randomly selected ACC members who responded to the May 5-11 online poll, nearly 45% said they'd be willing to go to educational events—but only if health safety measures are being enforced, such as limited attendance, social distancing and having attendees wear personal protective equipment. The ACC has more than 45,000 in-house lawyer members throughout the world.
"It's been hard to tell, until we got these numbers, about people's comfort levels and I think that with sort of conflicting points of view out there, it's kind of heartening that people do believe the safety measures are going to be sufficient," said Catherine Moynihan, assistant vice president of legal management services at the ACC.
More than 27% of respondents said it would take a widely available COVID-19 vaccine to get them to attend a CLE gathering. And about 3% reported that they were done with in-person education events and would only attend virtual events going forward.
Meanwhile, 17% said they would show up at an event as soon as the stay-at-home orders in their regions lifted.
"A total of two-thirds are willing to attend in-person events once the quarantine orders are lifted. I think that's good news that people are willing to get out there," Moynihan said.
The poll also showed the impact that COVID-19 has had on in-house lawyers' educational opportunities. Nearly 70% reported that the pandemic had prevented them from attending training sessions since March 1.
Interestingly, 36% of respondents said they typically attended virtual educational events live before the outbreak as opposed to on-demand recordings. But nearly 30% said they tuned in to both equally.
"Continuing legal education is, of course, important and to some extent live participation is important," Moynihan said.
Looking ahead, 46% of respondents expected their education and training budgets to decrease during the next year, compared with 3% who anticipated an increase. Nearly 30% thought their budgets would remain the same, while 21% were unsure about what was going to happen.
"These poll results touch on the concerns and challenges our members are facing with respect to one of their core responsibilities," ACC president and CEO Veta Richardson said in a written statement.
The ACC's next flash poll will focus on in-house counsel wellness, "which is something we've been paying attention to pre-coronavirus," Moynihan said.
Read More:
Workers' Leave, Sick Pay Among Top Employer Concerns in Age of COVID-19
How US Companies Reacted to Coronavirus Outbreak Just Before Spike in Cases
Why COVID-19 Cyber, Compliance Risks Should Rank High for In-House
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAd Agency Legal Chief Scores $12M Golden Parachute in $13B Sale to Rival
3 minute readFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 1—Managing Risk
- 3Change Is Coming to the EEOC—But Not Overnight
- 4Med Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
- 5Rejecting 'Blind Adherence to Outdated Precedent,’ US Judge Goes His Own Way on Attorney Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250