Are In-House Counsel Ready to Start Attending Educational Events Again?
Of the 405 ACC randomly selected members who responded to an online flash poll in early May, nearly 45% said they'd go to educational or training events—but only if health safety measures are being enforced.
May 18, 2020 at 02:21 PM
3 minute read
As parts of the world begin to reopen amid the coronavirus pandemic, many in-house lawyers are cautious but willing, under certain circumstances, to venture outside for continuing legal education and training, according to the latest COVID-19 member flash poll from the Association of Corporate Counsel.
Of the 405 randomly selected ACC members who responded to the May 5-11 online poll, nearly 45% said they'd be willing to go to educational events—but only if health safety measures are being enforced, such as limited attendance, social distancing and having attendees wear personal protective equipment. The ACC has more than 45,000 in-house lawyer members throughout the world.
"It's been hard to tell, until we got these numbers, about people's comfort levels and I think that with sort of conflicting points of view out there, it's kind of heartening that people do believe the safety measures are going to be sufficient," said Catherine Moynihan, assistant vice president of legal management services at the ACC.
More than 27% of respondents said it would take a widely available COVID-19 vaccine to get them to attend a CLE gathering. And about 3% reported that they were done with in-person education events and would only attend virtual events going forward.
Meanwhile, 17% said they would show up at an event as soon as the stay-at-home orders in their regions lifted.
"A total of two-thirds are willing to attend in-person events once the quarantine orders are lifted. I think that's good news that people are willing to get out there," Moynihan said.
The poll also showed the impact that COVID-19 has had on in-house lawyers' educational opportunities. Nearly 70% reported that the pandemic had prevented them from attending training sessions since March 1.
Interestingly, 36% of respondents said they typically attended virtual educational events live before the outbreak as opposed to on-demand recordings. But nearly 30% said they tuned in to both equally.
"Continuing legal education is, of course, important and to some extent live participation is important," Moynihan said.
Looking ahead, 46% of respondents expected their education and training budgets to decrease during the next year, compared with 3% who anticipated an increase. Nearly 30% thought their budgets would remain the same, while 21% were unsure about what was going to happen.
"These poll results touch on the concerns and challenges our members are facing with respect to one of their core responsibilities," ACC president and CEO Veta Richardson said in a written statement.
The ACC's next flash poll will focus on in-house counsel wellness, "which is something we've been paying attention to pre-coronavirus," Moynihan said.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Ben & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute read'It's Not About Speed': Forging Strong Legal Department-Law Firm Relationships Starts With Humility, Trust
6 minute readNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250