Increasing Number of Legal Departments Are Insourcing E-Discovery
"The cost of e-discovery has been escalating so fast that this is an area where companies have begun to insource," Catherine Moynihan, executive director of the Association of Corporate Counsel's legal operations arm said. "It was not sustainable in the balkanized model."
May 22, 2020 at 01:01 PM
3 minute read
Legal departments have decided to bring e-discovery services in-house as a way to cut costs and have better control over their litigation-related data, according to a report published by Exterro on Thursday.
According to "The State of E-Discovery 2020," which compiled data from several different legal reports published in the last year, 50% of legal departments have built-in e-discovery services.
Michael Hamilton, senior managing director of marketing at Exterro in Portland, said over the past couple of years there has been a trend in legal departments insourcing the e-discovery process. He explained that legal departments that have a high frequency of litigation were the first to insource the process and have begun to stop outsourcing the collection and review of data.
Hamilton said that legal departments who insource e-discovery have the ability to learn more about a particular matter much faster than they would if they were "playing phone tag with a service provider."
Catherine Moynihan, executive director at the Association of Corporate Counsel's legal operations arm in Washington, D.C., said that cost-cutting is the main reason companies insource e-discovery.
"The cost of e-discovery has been escalating so fast that this is an area where companies have begun to insource," Moynihan said. "It was not sustainable in the balkanized model."
Moynihan said another area that may be driving the insourcing of e-discovery is the convergence of legal and information governance functions.
"They are doing a lot of the same kinds of activities for data privacy and have to have an efficient way to keep a handle on their data," Moynihan said.
She said over the past five years many companies that have been named ACC champions have insourced e-discovery. Notably, AbbVie Inc., which was named an ACC champion in 2019, brought all of its data collection and data processing in-house. As a result, the e-discovery group now has the company's intellectual property and commercial litigation teams as its main internal clients. The company found a way to host all of its litigation data at a single low fixed rate and found $2 million in savings, according to a case study on the ACC's website.
The challenge to insourcing e-discovery is executive buy-in, according to Moynihan.
"You're adding a skill set that hasn't been a part of the legal department," Moynihan said. "You have to find lawyers who are deeply experienced in e-discovery. You have to add a technologist. That kind of change management is always a challenge."
Another area where corporations are finding savings is by having a smaller panel of outside counsel they work with. According to the report, 64% of legal departments have 10 or fewer law firms on their preferred panels. That is an increase from Exterro's 2019 report, which showed only 47% of corporations having 10 or fewer firms on their panel.
Moynihan said having a preferred panel of firms has been an ongoing trend and legal departments are continuing to cut back on the number of firms they use and reassess where their needs are.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Judge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
7 minute readCSX Joins Rest of Big Four Railroad Companies in Installing New Generation of Legal Leadership
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250