Increasing Number of Legal Departments Are Insourcing E-Discovery
"The cost of e-discovery has been escalating so fast that this is an area where companies have begun to insource," Catherine Moynihan, executive director of the Association of Corporate Counsel's legal operations arm said. "It was not sustainable in the balkanized model."
May 22, 2020 at 01:01 PM
3 minute read
Legal departments have decided to bring e-discovery services in-house as a way to cut costs and have better control over their litigation-related data, according to a report published by Exterro on Thursday.
According to "The State of E-Discovery 2020," which compiled data from several different legal reports published in the last year, 50% of legal departments have built-in e-discovery services.
Michael Hamilton, senior managing director of marketing at Exterro in Portland, said over the past couple of years there has been a trend in legal departments insourcing the e-discovery process. He explained that legal departments that have a high frequency of litigation were the first to insource the process and have begun to stop outsourcing the collection and review of data.
Hamilton said that legal departments who insource e-discovery have the ability to learn more about a particular matter much faster than they would if they were "playing phone tag with a service provider."
Catherine Moynihan, executive director at the Association of Corporate Counsel's legal operations arm in Washington, D.C., said that cost-cutting is the main reason companies insource e-discovery.
"The cost of e-discovery has been escalating so fast that this is an area where companies have begun to insource," Moynihan said. "It was not sustainable in the balkanized model."
Moynihan said another area that may be driving the insourcing of e-discovery is the convergence of legal and information governance functions.
"They are doing a lot of the same kinds of activities for data privacy and have to have an efficient way to keep a handle on their data," Moynihan said.
She said over the past five years many companies that have been named ACC champions have insourced e-discovery. Notably, AbbVie Inc., which was named an ACC champion in 2019, brought all of its data collection and data processing in-house. As a result, the e-discovery group now has the company's intellectual property and commercial litigation teams as its main internal clients. The company found a way to host all of its litigation data at a single low fixed rate and found $2 million in savings, according to a case study on the ACC's website.
The challenge to insourcing e-discovery is executive buy-in, according to Moynihan.
"You're adding a skill set that hasn't been a part of the legal department," Moynihan said. "You have to find lawyers who are deeply experienced in e-discovery. You have to add a technologist. That kind of change management is always a challenge."
Another area where corporations are finding savings is by having a smaller panel of outside counsel they work with. According to the report, 64% of legal departments have 10 or fewer law firms on their preferred panels. That is an increase from Exterro's 2019 report, which showed only 47% of corporations having 10 or fewer firms on their panel.
Moynihan said having a preferred panel of firms has been an ongoing trend and legal departments are continuing to cut back on the number of firms they use and reassess where their needs are.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Tech Is Cozying Up to President Trump. Here's Why Their Lawyers Are Cautiously Optimistic
LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
5 minute readAre Firms and In-House Teams Courting Technological Debt With Ambitious Purchases?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
- 2Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
- 3Divided Eighth Circuit Sides With GE's Timely Removal of Indemnification Action to Federal Court
- 4Former U.S. Dept. of Education Attorney Suspended for Failure to Complete CLE Credits
- 5ArentFox Schiff Adds Global Complex Litigation Partner in Los Angeles
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250