The Future Is Here: The Legal Profession Can Succeed Working Remotely
Now is the time to figure out if remote working is for you and your organization. It can be a positive distinguishing factor for companies that embrace it going forward.
May 27, 2020 at 01:42 PM
4 minute read
For years now, the push for organizations to implement regular work-from-home policies and practices has been a major area of debate. While the legal profession is typically slow to change, when forced into the change, it has become clear that legal work can be done effectively and efficiently remotely. Take away the distractions of children and spouses at home, along with the overall vibe of the current crisis, and work from home is rapidly becoming the chosen way of doing business for many industries, including the law. Furthermore, in order to attract top legal talent going forward, remote work options will need to be among the benefits offered by law firms and legal departments.
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, many organizations had basic work-from-home policies in place ranging from one scheduled day a week (sometimes only allowed after a year of employment) to allowing time at home on an as-needed basis for necessary appointments or other personal emergencies. However, in-house legal teams and law firms are now realizing they may not need as much traditional face time with their teams and discovering that remote work may led to happier, harder working lawyers.
In-house lawyers are telling me they are busier than usual and are effectively working from home. One general counsel indicated that, while he offered his team a once-a-week option to work from home previously, he would probably expand that going forward, as he's received positive feedback from his team and found they've been just as efficient while at home. In David Morley's article, "COVID Crystal Ball," he writes that flexible work has "overnight gone from tolerated to mainstream. A winning strategy will embrace that change and figure out how to prosper from it."
Legal leaders are seeing that their attorneys can be productive at home without the distractions of neighboring conversations and an often lengthy commute. They are able to focus on the tasks in front of them without being pulled away unexpectedly. They are also able to flex their hours to take care of personal needs, working into the evening or starting earlier in the day to get work-related tasks taken care of before tending to themselves.
The opportunity also exists for cost-saving measures to be taken, specifically for office space to be downsized. While office space will always be necessary for meetings and face time, it won't endure on the same scale to which we've grown accustomed.
Strong remote work policies will also be attractive to new talent. According to Major, Lindsey & Africa's Gen-Z: Shaping Tomorrow's Law Firm Culture survey report, 74% of respondents (current and graduating law students) expect that they will be able work remotely occasionally. Gen-Z are digital natives, so they are technologically savvy enough to navigate virtual meetings, access documents on company servers, and connect with their team from anywhere. Remote work also opens up a more diverse talent pool, especially when recruiting for difficult locations or niche specialties.
As more of Generation Z enters the workforce and millennials are promoted into leadership roles, remote working was already positioned to take a stronger hold; COVID-19 just sped up the implementation. Millennials currently make up the bulk of the workforce and have led the charge to make work from home more prevalent for years. They have long been defined by their strong desire for flexibility—firmly believing they can, and should be able to, accomplish their work from wherever they are—and the present status quo is proving they are right for the most part.
Now is the time to figure out if remote working is for you and your organization. It can be a positive distinguishing factor for companies that embrace it going forward.
Andrea Bricca is a Partner at Major, Lindsey & Africa where she focuses on placing senior lawyers in corporations and law firms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250