The Future Is Here: The Legal Profession Can Succeed Working Remotely
Now is the time to figure out if remote working is for you and your organization. It can be a positive distinguishing factor for companies that embrace it going forward.
May 27, 2020 at 01:42 PM
4 minute read
For years now, the push for organizations to implement regular work-from-home policies and practices has been a major area of debate. While the legal profession is typically slow to change, when forced into the change, it has become clear that legal work can be done effectively and efficiently remotely. Take away the distractions of children and spouses at home, along with the overall vibe of the current crisis, and work from home is rapidly becoming the chosen way of doing business for many industries, including the law. Furthermore, in order to attract top legal talent going forward, remote work options will need to be among the benefits offered by law firms and legal departments.
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, many organizations had basic work-from-home policies in place ranging from one scheduled day a week (sometimes only allowed after a year of employment) to allowing time at home on an as-needed basis for necessary appointments or other personal emergencies. However, in-house legal teams and law firms are now realizing they may not need as much traditional face time with their teams and discovering that remote work may led to happier, harder working lawyers.
In-house lawyers are telling me they are busier than usual and are effectively working from home. One general counsel indicated that, while he offered his team a once-a-week option to work from home previously, he would probably expand that going forward, as he's received positive feedback from his team and found they've been just as efficient while at home. In David Morley's article, "COVID Crystal Ball," he writes that flexible work has "overnight gone from tolerated to mainstream. A winning strategy will embrace that change and figure out how to prosper from it."
Legal leaders are seeing that their attorneys can be productive at home without the distractions of neighboring conversations and an often lengthy commute. They are able to focus on the tasks in front of them without being pulled away unexpectedly. They are also able to flex their hours to take care of personal needs, working into the evening or starting earlier in the day to get work-related tasks taken care of before tending to themselves.
The opportunity also exists for cost-saving measures to be taken, specifically for office space to be downsized. While office space will always be necessary for meetings and face time, it won't endure on the same scale to which we've grown accustomed.
Strong remote work policies will also be attractive to new talent. According to Major, Lindsey & Africa's Gen-Z: Shaping Tomorrow's Law Firm Culture survey report, 74% of respondents (current and graduating law students) expect that they will be able work remotely occasionally. Gen-Z are digital natives, so they are technologically savvy enough to navigate virtual meetings, access documents on company servers, and connect with their team from anywhere. Remote work also opens up a more diverse talent pool, especially when recruiting for difficult locations or niche specialties.
As more of Generation Z enters the workforce and millennials are promoted into leadership roles, remote working was already positioned to take a stronger hold; COVID-19 just sped up the implementation. Millennials currently make up the bulk of the workforce and have led the charge to make work from home more prevalent for years. They have long been defined by their strong desire for flexibility—firmly believing they can, and should be able to, accomplish their work from wherever they are—and the present status quo is proving they are right for the most part.
Now is the time to figure out if remote working is for you and your organization. It can be a positive distinguishing factor for companies that embrace it going forward.
Andrea Bricca is a Partner at Major, Lindsey & Africa where she focuses on placing senior lawyers in corporations and law firms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
- 2Construction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
- 3Phila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
- 4Lost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
- 5New Associates Yearbook 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250