Fired Miami Heat Associate General Counsel Forced Into Arbitration
Vered Yakovee, who worked for the NBA team for about four years, alleges that she was fired for requesting maternity leave after she adopted a baby. She argued, unsuccessfully, that she was rushed into signing an arbitration agreement when she was hired.
May 28, 2020 at 01:25 PM
4 minute read
The former Miami Heat lawyer who says she was fired for requesting maternity leave has failed to wriggle free of an arbitration agreement she signed when she was hired.
Vered Yakovee, who served as an associate general counsel for the NBA team from March 2015 until December 2019, had argued that the agreement was unconscionable because it was presented as a "take it or leave it" proposition and she wasn't given enough time to review or negotiate the terms of the agreement.
Yakovee is a veteran sports law attorney who previously served as associate team counsel for the Boston Celtics, taught sports law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law and was editor-in-chief for the American Bar Association's entertainment and sports lawyer publication.
She also asserted that the stand-alone, two-page arbitration agreement, which allows the Heat or Yakovee to arbitrate "any controversy" with the American Arbitration Association, contained a cost provision that is against public policy.
Finally, Yakovee argued that the court, not an arbitrator, must determine the validity of the arbitration agreement, which was silent on that particular issue.
Miami U.S. District Judge Federico Moreno rejected each of Yakovee's arguments, holding first that it is "well-settled that an arbitrator decides whether an agreement is unconscionable." Moreno could have ended his analysis here, but he went on to address Yakovee's remaining assertions.
She had contended that the cost clause, which stated that an arbitrator may award reasonable fees to a prevailing party but "shall not otherwise award attorney's fees or costs," rendered the agreement unenforceable because fees and costs must be recoverable when allowed by applicable statute and not "otherwise."
Moreno disagreed with that interpretation. He also held that, even if the cost provision was unenforceable, it could be severed from the arbitration agreement.
As for Yakovee's argument that she wasn't given enough time to review the agreement, Moreno held that her allegations were "insufficient to amount to procedural unconscionability."
He noted that Yakovee hadn't presented "any evidence, via affidavit or otherwise, to explain any specific reason she felt rushed to sign the agreement, had no ability to negotiate it, or lacked employment alternatives.
"This stand-alone Arbitration Agreement was sufficiently straightforward for an executive to understand. It was not buried in fine print," he added.
The dispute is now before the American Arbitration Association, according to Yakovee's attorney, Erika Rotbart of Deutsch Rotbart & Associates in Boca Raton, Florida.
"Regardless of the venue, be it court or arbitration, we remain confident in the allegations set forth in Ms. Yakovee's complaint," she stated Wednesday in an email.
The Heat's attorney, Paul Ranis of Greenberg Traurig in Fort Lauderdale, did not respond to a message seeking comment.
In its motion to compel arbitration, the Heat described Yakovee as having been a "disruptive, toxic, and sub-standard employee who single-handedly consumed more attention from human resources and senior management than any other individual employee."
The Heat also accused Yakovee of filing a "frivolous and factually deficient lawsuit" as part of an attempt to circumvent an arbitration agreement, tarnish the organization's reputation and "obtain a premature trial through press and public speculation."
The team contends that the decision to fire Yakovee was based solely on her "deficient attitude, disruptive behavior" and poor job performance.
Yakovee alleges that the Heat's general counsel, Raquel Libman, treated her with "disdain and hostility" when she took maternity leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act after adopting a newborn baby.
She said the situation culminated with the Heat's president of business operations calling her into his office, where he "told her she was terminated, and to go home immediately."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250