Employee Safety Should Be Top of Mind for In-House Counsel as Protests Continue
"That is the catchall in the OSHA Act that says employers have to provide a safe workplace which is free from recognized hazards," Todd Logsdon, a partner at Fisher & Phillips and co-chair of the firm's workplace safety practice group in Louisville, Kentucky, explained.
June 02, 2020 at 05:38 PM
4 minute read
In-house counsel need to consider the safety of their employees as protests break out over the death of George Floyd, an unarmed black man, who was killed in Minneapolis last month by police officer Derek Chauvin while three other officers watched.
Todd Logsdon, a partner at Fisher & Phillips and co-chair of the firm's workplace safety practice group in Louisville, Kentucky, said in an interview that companies with retail locations that have been looted could be liable under the general duty clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
"That is the catchall in the OSHA Act that says employers have to provide a safe workplace which is free from recognized hazards," Logsdon said.
He explained the general duty clause of OSHA has been used with varying degrees of success over the years for workplace violence issues but said it could come up in these cases if an employee is hurt.
Further, in-house counsel should be cognizant that if any employees get hurt during the civil unrest, there will also be workers' compensation claims they will have to contend with.
Most stores are closing at nighttime when the majority of looting appears to be happening, and that will likely save stores from workers' compensation lawsuits, Logsdon said.
"If a retail establishment is in the area where they know a protest is going to take place it is important to shut down before that happens," Logsdon said.
Most states have an avenue for injured employees to pursue litigation after making a workers' compensation claim, Logsdon said. Especially if companies are expecting their employees to defend those stores. However, he said he has not seen companies expect employees to stand in the defense of company property during protests.
Many of the national companies that were looted over the weekend have temporarily closed some or all of their stores.
Minneapolis-based Target Corp. did not make general counsel Don Liu available for an interview. However, a spokesperson pointed Corporate Counsel to a statement CEO Brian Cornell made online. He said the company is working with its displaced employees to make sure they have full pay and benefits in the coming weeks.
Target has closed certain stores across the country, including those in Minneapolis, California, Illinois, Philadelphia and Atlanta.
"In any of our other locations that are damaged or at risk, the safety and well-being of our team, guests and the surrounding community will continue to be our paramount priority," Cornell wrote.
Seattle-based Nordstrom also announced that operations at all of its stores in the U.S. will be temporarily suspended for the coming weeks. A spokesperson for the company did not make general counsel Ann Munson Steines available for comment. The company said in a statement posted to its website that the safety of its employees is paramount.
"Thankfully, none of our employees were injured in these events, and we're communicating regularly with all of them on the actions we're taking and the ways we will continue to support them," the company said in a statement. "We'll also pay employees for any shifts they may have missed as a result of these unexpected closures."
Other companies that had stores damaged from looting include CVS Health, Walmart Inc., Macy's Inc. and Apple Inc. Spokespeople for those companies did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Pre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute read$25M Grubhub Settlement Sheds Light on How Other Gig Economy Firms Can Avoid Regulatory Trouble
8 minute readEx-Red Robin CLO Joins Norton Rose Fulbright After Helping Sell Latest Employer for $4.9 Billion
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250