In-House Counsel Concerned Over Liabilities Associated With COVID-19
"We don't really know what is going to come out from a liability standpoint from COVID-19," Alka Ramchandani-Raj, of counsel at Littler Mendelson, said. "Some cases may be brought with regards to safety violations. There have also been inquiries from plaintiffs attorneys on WARN Act requirements."
June 02, 2020 at 09:22 AM
3 minute read
Seventy-one percent of in-house counsel indicated they are concerned about the liabilities their companies face when bringing employees back to work during the new coronavirus pandemic, according to the COVID-19 Return to Work Survey published by Littler Mendelson on Tuesday.
"The wave of COVID-19 litigation has begun in haste and poses a real threat to employers, most of whom are already grappling with the economic fallout from this pandemic," Michael Lotito, shareholder and co-chairman of Littler's workplace policy institute in San Francisco, said in the report.
Alka Ramchandani-Raj, of counsel at Littler in Walnut Creek, California, said in an interview on Monday that she was not surprised that in-house counsel believe litigation and complaints against employers will arise once the pandemic is over.
"We don't really know what is going to come out from a liability standpoint from COVID-19," Ramchandani-Raj said. "Some cases may be brought with regards to safety violations. There have also been inquiries from plaintiffs attorneys on WARN Act requirements."
Of the in-house counsel surveyed, 68% believe there will be an uptick in leave of absence entitlements and 59% of in-house counsel surveyed believe there will be an uptick in unsafe-workplace-condition complaints.
Ramchandani-Raj also said employers with essential workers may see a rise in workers' compensation claims. She said for many states there is a presumption that if an employee becomes sick, then it is work-related.
The best defense for the variety of claims that may arise once the pandemic ends is to pay attention to the various orders coming from state and local government and comply with those orders if feasible.
"Ignorance is not bliss right now," Ramchandani-Raj said. "Employers should know what's out there."
"In the face of so much uncertainty, legislative safeguards and clear guidance from federal and state agencies are important in providing employers with sufficient confidence to reopen their workplaces—and to do so in compliance with the law," Lotito said in the report.
According to the report, 44% of the respondents anticipate bringing employees back to work in the next one to three months. Thirty-four percent of respondents anticipate bringing employees back within the next month.
"Even if the government gives employers the green light to bring employees back, they [state and local governments] are giving employers a lot of instructions. To come into compliance will take time," Ramchandani-Raj said.
Some of the regulations required for employers to open back up will include social distancing and keeping employees six feet apart at all times and to minimize locations in an office where employees are close together.
Of the number of professionals, 1,010 responded to the firm's survey. The respondents included 59% of human resource professionals, 31% of general counsel and in-house counsel, and 10% of C-suite executives. The question over litigation was only asked to in-house counsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know
14 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
- 2Startup Bringing AI to Doctors' Offices Hires First GC
- 3NFT Buyers Accuse Nelk Boys of Ripping Them Off
- 4Perkins Coie Hires Anthony Shannon as Chief People Officer
- 5Who Is Nicholas J. Ganjei? His Rise to Top Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250