CEOs Want General Counsel 'More Strategically Involved' in Leadership Roles
Seventy percent of chief executives surveyed said that an ideal general counsel should serve as both a strategic business partner at the company and as an important member of its leadership team, but only 55% of those CEOs said that their current GC fills those roles.
June 03, 2020 at 10:44 AM
4 minute read
Many chief executives at U.S. companies want their general counsel to be "more strategically involved" in the business decisions and leadership of their companies, according to a newly released survey of more than 100 public and private corporate CEOs.
And while the trend of placing GCs in senior executive and leadership roles at corporations has been growing, especially at public companies, the majority of CEOs say they want more from the GCs, according to the survey conducted by Chief Executive Group, a media and peer networks-oriented group for CEOs, and BarkerGilmore, an executive search firm.
To that point, 70% of chief executives surveyed said an ideal GC should serve as both a strategic business partner at the company and as an important member of its leadership team, but only 55% of those CEOs said that their current GC fills those roles, according to a news release and a 14-page report about the survey.
Moreover, only 8% of the CEOs indicated that their ideal GC would act only as a legal counselor and manager of legal risk, reported Chief Executive Group and BarkerGilmore, which works with corporations to recruit legal and compliance executives.
CEOs also "shared that their General Counsel add the most value by offering risk analysis expertise and acting as their adviser," according to a BarkerGilmore news release issued Tuesday about the survey.
"At both public and private companies, CEOs believe the top three ways General Counsel make the greatest impact to their teams are litigation/investigation management, risk management, and crisis management," BarkerGilmore added.
Another survey finding was that 84% of public company CEOs who responded have their GCs on their company's executive management team. But only 57% of private company CEOs surveyed do.
"The role of the general counsel has evolved significantly over the past decades, from a pure legal risk management function in the 1980s to that of adviser to the CEO—and board—on many aspects of the strategy through the 2000s and 2010s," the report on the survey, which was conducted in February 2020, said.
"If it hadn't been proven before, the argument for this evolution has undoubtedly been brought into evidence in recent years, when the constant state of disruption and a slew of corporate scandals have further exposed the critical importance of the GC at the executive table," the report continued.
It added that "just four years ago, in a 2016 survey conducted by Corporate Board Member (then NYSE Governance Services) and BarkerGilmore, 97 percent of public company directors said they expected their GC to be an integral part of the senior executive team by 2020—up from 81 percent who already were 10 years prior." And then it said, "When polled in early 2020, 96 percent of public company CEOs confirmed this had, indeed, become the new reality."
But, the report said, private companies "continue to lag," with only 57% of CEOs saying their GC was a senior executive team member. And it noted that private-company GCs are "typically entrusted with more corporate administrative duties than strategic advisory roles," and some "choose to only retain legal counsel as needed and have made a strategic decision to keep the function external."
"Yet, the majority of CEOs in our study say the role the GC plays in providing early legal input into the strategy and its translation into operations is critical regardless of size. In fact, possibly even more so with smaller, more fragile companies that must have a robust risk mitigation strategy," the report said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLooming Legal Threats, the Murdochs' Influence Make Fox CLO Vacancy Both Alluring and Terrifying
Trending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250