Legal Departments Need More Control Over Corporate Data Compliance Programs
"All of the issues surrounding legal, governance, risk and compliance all start with the fundamental element of data," Bill Piwonka, chief marketing officer at Exterro, said. "How companies collect, store and access data determines the amount of risk that data poses to the organization."
June 11, 2020 at 04:58 PM
3 minute read
Although best positioned to understand the patchwork of different data privacy laws across the country, only one in six legal departments are tasked with ensuring that data is managed in compliance with those laws, according to Exterro Inc.'s 2020 Corporate Legal Leaders Survey.
Bill Piwonka, chief marketing officer of Exterro in Beaverton, Oregon, told Corporate Counsel that there is an increasing number of legal departments taking charge of data compliance. However, 54% of respondents indicated that corporate information technology functions are tasked with ensuring data is managed to comply with different legal requirements.
"All of the issues surrounding legal, governance, risk and compliance all start with the fundamental element of data," Piwonka said. "How companies collect, store and access data determines the amount of risk that data poses to the organization."
Legal is best suited to understand the various reporting times for when a data breach occurs and the risks associated with holding on to consumer data longer than required by law. While many general counsel acknowledge the importance of deleting data, seven out of 10 of the general counsel who responded indicated that their organization does not have a data minimization/deletion program. Only one in five respondents indicated their organizations had a plan in place for managing data in relation to privacy, legal, compliance and cybersecurity issues; however, 99% of respondents recognized the importance of such a plan.
"All of this is very important, but the reality for us (and I know from many conversations with other GCs at other organizations) is that we are severely overworked, overwhelmed and understaffed, so the urgent crisis always takes precedence over the 'we need to do' list," an anonymous general counsel who responded to the survey said.
Many corporations have taken the view that data storage is cheap, Piwonka said, and they do not want to miss out on business opportunities data can provide.
"No one wants to push the button to delete something," Piwonka said. "If you permanently delete something that did have business value, that can be a career-eliminating move."
Companies that fail to regularly delete the data they're not legally required to keep could face the risk of having that data used against them in litigation and compromised during a data breach. There are also regulatory actions companies could face if they hold onto consumer data longer than necessary.
"If you're keeping data that you shouldn't be, you're in violation of the CCPA [California Consumer Privacy Act]," Piwonka said.
Over 150 general counsel and chief legal officers responded to the survey. They come from organizations with legal departments that have less than five employees to those with more than 50 employees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCSX Joins Rest of Big Four Railroad Companies in Installing New Generation of Legal Leadership
'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
3 minute readRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
As Uncertainty Hovers Over PGA Merger, LIV Golf Hires Entertainment Industry Veteran as Legal Chief
Trending Stories
- 1Maryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
- 2Thompson Coburn Hit With Class Action Over Data Breach
- 3The Coming of Trump's Judicial Picks Spurs Liberals to Press for Biden's
- 4'We Should Be Pragmatic': Meet the Possible Next FTC Chair
- 5Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250