The Next Phase of Growth: Why Strategic GC Hiring Is Continuing Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
GC hiring has continued for many tech startups even amid the current uncertain environment. Companies need in-house legal counsel to navigate new challenges posed by the pandemic, including regulatory and compliance, labor, and privacy issues.
June 17, 2020 at 06:22 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The exponential growth of the Silicon Beach tech scene has not only changed the landscape of the Los Angeles area's business community, but has also created a significant opportunity for in-house legal talent as these companies engage with firms to aid and guide their growth. Though the COVID-19 pandemic has admittedly upended the hiring landscape for many companies, strategic GC hiring has continued for many tech startups even amid the current uncertain environment. Indeed, these hires may prove more critical than ever as companies navigate new challenges posed by the pandemic, including regulatory and compliance, labor, and privacy issues.
Often, the most significant factor that can swing the balance in favor of onboarding a tech startup's first GC is, simply, efficiency of legal spend. When companies reach the conclusion that it makes more financial and logistical sense to bring on an internal legal hire, rather than continue to engage with an outside firm. The point at which companies reach this conclusion depends on the industry and life cycle—but when this determination is reached, it's likely to assume that a GC search will soon be underway.
Indeed, as spending is scrutinized more closely during the pandemic, bringing on a GC will save attorneys' fees due to the sheer volume of previously outsourced work that this hire will now take on. Many companies have more legal work than ever before as they manage their response to the pandemic, from navigating furloughs and layoffs and closing manufacturing sites to charting the course to eventual reopening. In general, it's more efficient from both a cost and time perspective to have an internal resource on hand for these issues and questions, rather than turning to outside counsel. In addition to the immediate cost benefit this hire will offer a tech company, this individual will also be able to guide further expenditures and serve in an advisory capacity across the business more broadly.
Industry also plays a major role in this calculus. Generally, companies that operate in heavily-regulated industries, such as health care and privacy, tend to need a GC earlier on in their lifecycle in order to help them navigate the associated complexities that these regulations entail. This reality has only been heightened during the pandemic. It's true that companies in some fields—like pre-IPO companies that have now tabled these plans due to the market downturn—may put a planned GC hire on pause. However, many consumer-facing tech companies are facing increased privacy issues and need extra support at this time. Others, like healthcare-adjacent companies, are continuing to sell their products through the pandemic, or may anticipate a significant rebound by the end of the year. For those reasons, they are continuing to make strategic GC hires not only to help them chart through the current challenges, but also to position themselves competitively for an expected uptick as normal business operations eventually resume.
Though the COVID-19 pandemic has certainly slowed some hiring activity, it has also highlighted the importance of the GC as a counselor across many aspects of the business, particularly for emerging industries in tech as they deal with new challenges created by the current environment. Still, it's not always simple to find a candidate who is the right fit and provides optimal value add to a startup in a critical phase. In general, these searches can be made all the more difficult considering the candidate profile for a GC tends to be somewhat distinctive:
Companies are often looking for a GC who understands their product and where the industry is headed. GCs for tech companies also tend to have an entrepreneurial spirit and a greater tolerance for risk. Finding a candidate of this profile could take somewhat longer than filling a GC position in more traditional industries. That being said, the current uncertainty might play to the advantage of tech companies in search of the perfect GC, as some candidates might be more willing now to roll the dice on an early-stage company whose mission and future they believe in.
As companies decide whether to move ahead with GC searches, efficiency of legal spend will remain a paramount consideration. So too will their ability to bring on a strategic hire that has the right background and expertise to steer a company through the unique issues it may be facing at this time. As LA tech startups continue to operate and even grow in these times, GC hires will serve as important strategic counselors through not only the legal challenges that have emerged during the pandemic, but also in navigating businesses more broadly through an unprecedented time in history.
Gigi Birchfield is a partner in in-house counsel recruiting and managing partner of the Los Angeles office of Major, Lindsey & Africa.
PJ Harari is a partner in in-house counsel recruiting of Major, Lindsey & Africa.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSilicon Legal: Tech Companies Stand Up and Speak Out Against Texas Abortion Law
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250