Compensation the Main Reason Why In-House Counsel Want New Jobs
"While 40% of survey respondents indicated a probable job search in 2020, the effects of the COVID-19 crisis might impact these decisions. Yet, as lawyers are an essential role to organizations, our search consultants have not seen a change in open legal positions," reads the 2020 In-House Counsel Compensation Report from executive search firm BarkerGilmore.
June 24, 2020 at 03:28 PM
3 minute read
Approximately 40% of in-house counsel indicated they would be looking for another job in 2020, according to BarkerGilmore's 2020 In-House Compensation Report released Tuesday.
BarkerGilmore conducted the survey from February to April of this year. Over 1,900 in-house attorneys responded to the survey. All of the respondents are based in the United States and work for nonprofit, public or private organizations.
The report acknowledges the pandemic caused by the new coronavirus may change the outlook on in-house counsel who are looking for new jobs. However, the number of attorneys who said they would be looking for a new job in 2020 went up by 2% this year.
"While 40% of survey respondents indicated a probable job search in 2020, the effects of the COVID-19 crisis might impact these decisions. Yet, as lawyers are an essential role to organizations, our search consultants have not seen a change in open legal positions," the report says.
Bob Barker, a managing partner at BarkerGilmore in Rochester, New York, said on Wednesday that he would expect that number to stay roughly the same.
"What this information indicates is that people are frustrated and are looking for something different," Barker said.
Almost 40% of respondents said they believe their compensation is below or significantly below that of their peers at other organizations, which could be driving the high rate of in-house attorneys who are looking for a new job over the next year.
Barker explained that salary is most important to in-house counsel because that is "what they can take to the bank."
"The long-term incentives are typically stock-based," Barker explained. "That becomes more important as you rise in the ranks. Particularly for GCs in public companies because it can become a significant component of their wealth."
When it comes to industry, those in the technology and health care industries indicated they were the most likely to look for a new job within the next year. Those in the life sciences are the least likely to look for a new job, according to the report.
Men in managing counsel positions indicated that they are 44% likely to look for a new job in the next year. Women in the same position at 35% indicated they will be seeking a new job in the next year.
"This year, in-house counsel with practice area concentrations in litigation and intellectual property are most likely to consider a move for compensation issues, while those who identify with an insurance or compliance area report least likely to move," the report states.
According to the report, women at the general counsel level only make 81% of what their male counterparts make. The median total compensation male general counsel last year was $630,000. For female general counsel, it was $537,000.
At the managing counsel position, women made more. The median total compensation for women was $366,500 and for men $360,000. Women made less than men at the senior counsel position. According to the report, men at the senior counsel role had a median total compensation at $240,000 and women in that role made $235,000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1AIAs: A Look At the Future of AI-Related Contracts
- 2Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 5Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250