Compensation the Main Reason Why In-House Counsel Want New Jobs
"While 40% of survey respondents indicated a probable job search in 2020, the effects of the COVID-19 crisis might impact these decisions. Yet, as lawyers are an essential role to organizations, our search consultants have not seen a change in open legal positions," reads the 2020 In-House Counsel Compensation Report from executive search firm BarkerGilmore.
June 24, 2020 at 03:28 PM
3 minute read
Approximately 40% of in-house counsel indicated they would be looking for another job in 2020, according to BarkerGilmore's 2020 In-House Compensation Report released Tuesday.
BarkerGilmore conducted the survey from February to April of this year. Over 1,900 in-house attorneys responded to the survey. All of the respondents are based in the United States and work for nonprofit, public or private organizations.
The report acknowledges the pandemic caused by the new coronavirus may change the outlook on in-house counsel who are looking for new jobs. However, the number of attorneys who said they would be looking for a new job in 2020 went up by 2% this year.
"While 40% of survey respondents indicated a probable job search in 2020, the effects of the COVID-19 crisis might impact these decisions. Yet, as lawyers are an essential role to organizations, our search consultants have not seen a change in open legal positions," the report says.
Bob Barker, a managing partner at BarkerGilmore in Rochester, New York, said on Wednesday that he would expect that number to stay roughly the same.
"What this information indicates is that people are frustrated and are looking for something different," Barker said.
Almost 40% of respondents said they believe their compensation is below or significantly below that of their peers at other organizations, which could be driving the high rate of in-house attorneys who are looking for a new job over the next year.
Barker explained that salary is most important to in-house counsel because that is "what they can take to the bank."
"The long-term incentives are typically stock-based," Barker explained. "That becomes more important as you rise in the ranks. Particularly for GCs in public companies because it can become a significant component of their wealth."
When it comes to industry, those in the technology and health care industries indicated they were the most likely to look for a new job within the next year. Those in the life sciences are the least likely to look for a new job, according to the report.
Men in managing counsel positions indicated that they are 44% likely to look for a new job in the next year. Women in the same position at 35% indicated they will be seeking a new job in the next year.
"This year, in-house counsel with practice area concentrations in litigation and intellectual property are most likely to consider a move for compensation issues, while those who identify with an insurance or compliance area report least likely to move," the report states.
According to the report, women at the general counsel level only make 81% of what their male counterparts make. The median total compensation male general counsel last year was $630,000. For female general counsel, it was $537,000.
At the managing counsel position, women made more. The median total compensation for women was $366,500 and for men $360,000. Women made less than men at the senior counsel position. According to the report, men at the senior counsel role had a median total compensation at $240,000 and women in that role made $235,000.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250