Corporate Investigations Won't Wait, Even During a Pandemic
McDermott Will & Emery hosted a webinar Wednesday that examined the challenges that corporate legal departments are facing when trying to conduct internal investigations in the midst of a pandemic and a surge in remote working.
June 24, 2020 at 02:34 PM
4 minute read
The number of internal investigations that legal departments find themselves grappling with may be on the rise at a time when a period of enforced remote working is making it more difficult to conduct those processes than ever before.
On Wednesday, the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery hosted a webinar titled "Best Practices and Tactics for Conducting an Internal Investigation in the COVID-19 Era" and one of the biggest takeaways was that the pandemic opens the door to a whole host of investigative activity.
Panelist Dana McSherry, a partner at McDermott, pointed to the greater capacity for employee misconduct when working remotely. She also noted that the Department of Justice will likely be on high alert for COVID-19-related abuses, such as the misuse of stimulus money.
Organizations that chose to delay the resulting investigatory work may be playing with fire since key evidence or witnesses can be lost to layoffs or other unexpected developments. McSherry urged the audience to keep explicit notes of any deviations that may occur from a standard investigation schedule. "Any sort of alteration to your approach or your timeline should be thoughtful and reasonable and justified under the circumstances," McSherry said.
"I sort of think about it like this: If you get a subpoena while you are waiting to investigate an allegation of potential wrongdoing, you are certainly going to wish that you started your investigation sooner," McSherry said.
But to be sure, the realities of the pandemic and the surge in remote working that has followed can make conducting an investigation more difficult. For example, legal departments may have to increase their reliance on employees to preserve key data, which isn't always ideal given the range of technological competencies contained within a given workforce.
Panelist Shamis Beckley, a partner at McDermott, indicated that attorneys might have to be proactive about coaching employees to preserve data. One example she gave was teaching someone how to adjust the settings on their phone so that text messages aren't automatically deleted every few days.
"It's not just enough to tell people to preserve. Think about how you can help them do that or tell them how to do that," Beckley said.
A similar complication that may pop up—especially during a pandemic—is the safeguarding of personal health information. Beckley encouraged corporate attorneys in the audience to help their employees think carefully about any documents they may be handling that contain personal health information and to review the important safety measures like passwords.
One area where a greater emphasis on remote technologies may actually benefit the investigation process is conducting interviews. Matt Knowles, a partner with McDermott, pointed out that phone calls or videoconferences allow lawyers to cram more interviews into a shorter time frame, often at less expense to the client due to the lack of physical travel involved.
Still, this process requires a fair amount of strategy. Knowles encouraged people to think carefully about the use of phone versus video, which may hinge largely on what the interview subject is most amenable to or their level of technical prowess. The phone, for instance, may make it harder to tell if the interviewee is recording the conversation surreptitiously.
"Assume you are being recorded, assume that your questions and the way those questions are being answered could be disclosed down the road and be really thoughtful about your approach," Knowles said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Track: AI Is Sure to Fray Big Law's Devotion to Billable Hour
Up-and-Comer Scores First Legal Chief Post With Baltimore Orioles, the Team He Cheered for as Kid
From Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250