Are Companies and Legal Departments Ready for Life Post-Email?
Organizations have grown increasingly sophisticated in their use of external communications platforms like Slack Connect but expect to see new policies and formal agreements pop up post-COVID-19.
July 01, 2020 at 03:23 PM
3 minute read
Slack recently introduced a new tool, Slack Connect, that allows as many as 20 different organizations or entities to work together across the same channel. According to the company's website, the channel-based messaging system was "designed to replace email." But are corporate legal departments and their organizations ready for such a shift?
If not properly managed, communications channels that exist outside of the more familiar boundaries of email can bring headaches to a business grappling to comply with various obligations related to privacy, information security and e-discovery. However, legal departments spurred on by pandemic-induced remote working and the increasing prevalence of such tools may already be adequately prepared to handle those challenges.
Susanna McDonald, vice president and chief legal officer of the Association of Corporate Counsel, indicated that companies that have not already established protocols around the use of personal devices or external communications platforms may be taking a closer look post-COVID-19.
"Companies that did not have [Bring Your Own Device] or Technology Use policies for people working from home are definitely adopting them," McDonald said over email. "Those that did have such policies are changing them to respond to the new realities of working from home and the need to collaborate both internally and externally."
To be sure, the prevalence of collaboration platforms inside companies or corporate legal departments is nothing new—especially in places where secure business solutions are not provided. But there may be other practical benefits to those channels that are pushing companies away from email.
Christopher Ballod, a partner at Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, noted that most internal communications are not things that need to be retained forever and that the easiest data to protect is the kind that no longer exists. Email can become a repository where information sits forever and can eventually become a liability to an organization down the road.
"I've seen that in a litigation context for years now, countless times where a simple internal email is taken out of context and framed as a smoking gun when in fact it's just a quick little communication trying to ask somebody a question who has full context and knows exactly what they are asking," Ballod said.
However, companies that don't take an organized or purposeful approach to platforms like Slack also risk information being scattered haphazardly across a variety of unknown or difficult to access sources, which can become a problem in the event of e-discovery. Mary Mack, CEO and chief legal technologist at EDRM, referenced the existence of "shadow IT departments"— segments of an organization that were implementing external communications channels without informing the company at large.
This practices lends itself to a situation where information is inadvertently displaced. But now Mack thinks that businesses could be on the cusp of an evolution. She anticipates companies using platforms like Slack Connect to partner with one another will first hammer out formal agreements that assign responsibility for key tasks like the protection of personal data.
"This is a level of maturity, to have formal agreements with companies to collaborate. To create a formal collaboration space as opposed to individual corporate employees deciding to get an outpost," Mack said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Track: AI Is Sure to Fray Big Law's Devotion to Billable Hour
Up-and-Comer Scores First Legal Chief Post With Baltimore Orioles, the Team He Cheered for as Kid
From Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250