In-House Counsel Should Create Re-Exit Plan to Prepare for COVID-19 Case Spike
"I think general counsel will be well received if they focus on not only what can't be done, which might mean coming into a building, but potentially what may be able to be done," Jonathan Segal, a partner at Duane Morris in Philadelphia, said.
July 16, 2020 at 04:08 PM
3 minute read
In-house counsel should consider what their employees are allowed to do while working from home when creating a re-exit plan as cases for the new coronavirus spike again and companies prepare for a second wave of the virus.
According to data gathered by Gartner Legal and Compliance in May and June, only 3% of in-house counsel indicated their companies have a re-exit plan finalized. More than half, at 53%, of respondents said they are in the middle of working on a re-exit plan.
"The first critical thing that any in-house lawyer dealing with this needs to understand is that they're going to be making decisions on imperfect information," Jonathan Segal, partner and managing principal at Duane Morris in Philadelphia, said.
The guidance from different state governments are changing on an almost weekly basis and in-house counsel should create broad plans that can change as quickly as the health guidances change. Just this week states that were on the path to reopening have put stringent restrictions on travel and amended how indoor businesses operate. Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf on Wednesday required employees to work from home if they could. Earlier in the week, California Gov. Gavin Newsom imposed restrictions on indoor businesses.
In-house counsel will have to answer the question of what employees are allowed to do when re-exiting the office and working from home.
"People are anxious about the fact that they're not having the connections or contact that build relationships or generate sales," Segal said.
Employees may want to know what restrictions are being placed on them for nearby travel that is work-related.
"I think general counsel will be well received if they focus on not only what can't be done, which might mean coming into a building, but potentially what may be able to be done," Segal said.
Additionally, for re-exiting, employees should be broadly reminded of issues such as time reporting, expenses for nonexempt employees, workers' compensation and data privacy and security.
Despite the risks of having to send employees back home because of COVID-19, in-house counsel are still planning ways to bring them back. The data gathered by Gartner indicates 95% of in-house counsel said their companies will not bring their employees back to work until social-distancing arrangements can be made for the office. Of the 95 in-house counsel polled, 79% indicated adequate personal protective equipment should be in place before employees return to the office.
"In most cases, however, things will look very different for employees, and employers will need to make significant changes to workspace planning and acquire new resources such as PPE," Brian Lee, managing vice president in the Gartner legal and compliance practice in Washington, D.C., said in a statement.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEmployers Race to File NLRB Petitions to Gain Upper Hand in Union Organizing
5 minute readTractor Supply Co.'s Stock Takes Hit After Activists Bash Its Embrace of DEI
6 minute readCorporate Boards May Be Underestimating the Talent Challenges Ahead
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: It's Bonus Time
- 3Maryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
- 4Thompson Coburn Hit With Class Action Over Data Breach
- 5The Coming of Trump's Judicial Picks Spurs Liberals to Press for Biden's
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250