Philadelphia ACC Chapter Continued Diversity In-House Internship Despite COVID-19
"This is a program that is meant to foster diversity within legal departments and to give these diverse students an opportunity to experience in-house practice. If we weren't going to be able to do that, my fear was the impact it was going to have on these students," Sadeq Khan, chief compliance officer and deputy general counsel at Vertical Screen Inc. in Warminster, Pennsylvania, said.
July 20, 2020 at 06:25 PM
4 minute read
Despite mild setbacks caused by the new coronavirus, the Association of Corporate Counsel Greater Philadelphia was able to continue its Diversity Corporate Summer Internship Program for the 13th year.
The internship is open to 1L and 2L students. Law students apply to the ACC GP and the organization selects and sets law students up with interviews with participating legal departments. Students who apply must submit a statement explaining their "substantial obstacles in the pursuit of a legal career" or that they are "a member of a group underrepresented in the legal profession."
Recognizing that diversity goes beyond race and religion, Sadeq Khan, who oversees the program in his role as co-chair of the diversity committee at ACC GP, said applicants are now allowed to make a case for why they are diverse and what their challenges have been.
"There are a lot of different people who can be diverse and bring that perspective to a legal department," Khan, who also serves as chief compliance officer and deputy general counsel at Vertical Screen Inc. in Warminster, Pennsylvania, said.
Companies that participate in the program must make a commitment to pay interns a stipend of $7,500. The ACC GP will allocate $2,500 of that from an endowment fund for companies that participate for the first time. Some companies told Khan after they made offers to students they would have to drop out of the program, and Khan feared some students would be without a summer experience. Khan said students who have a summer gap for one year may find it difficult to apply for jobs.
"This is a program that is meant to foster diversity within legal departments and to give these diverse students an opportunity to experience in-house practice. If we weren't going to be able to do that, my fear was the impact it was going to have on these students," Khan said.
To help alleviate the financial burden, Khan said, the ACC GP extended the $2,500 to all companies, regardless of whether or not they have participated in the past.
Companies involved in this year's internship program were Vertical Screen; American Water, ARI Fleet Management Co., Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Cigna; Comcast Corp., Exelon Corp., Fanatics Inc., PJM Interconnection LLC, Power Home Remodeling, TE Connectivity, Teleflex Inc., Unisys Corp., Venerable Holdings Inc. and Wawa Inc.
"These companies really bent over backward to make sure they could keep these interns on and have the internship they were promised," Khan said.
He said one thing students missed out on this year is the face-to-face interaction that is critical for in-house counsel. Khan said at Vertical Screen, he and his boss, general counsel N. Alexander Erlam, manage the interns and usually introduce them to the business leaders in the company.
"Allowing our interns to meet people in other departments is unique for us," Khan said of working in a legal department. "There are people in sales and marketing and those are the folks that in-house counsel deal with on a daily basis."
Beyond not being able to meet face to face with leaders in departments outside of legal, much of the work for the interns have stayed the same.
"We had the benefit of the internship starting after most of these companies went remote. By the time the internship started most of these companies had been working from home for two months," Khan said.
He also said the program usually provides outside-of-work opportunities for the interns to meet with each other and network with in-house attorneys in the area. However, there have been Zoom meetings between the interns.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250