Former Penn State General Counsel Reprimanded Over Sandusky Grand Jury Representation
"The reason I am speaking out now is because I don't want this to ever happen to anybody else and I certainly don't want it to happen to any lawyers of color," Cynthia Baldwin, former general counsel of Pennsylvania State University, said.
July 22, 2020 at 06:50 PM
4 minute read
The former general counsel of Pennsylvania State University, Cynthia Baldwin, was publicly reprimanded in a live YouTube stream Wednesday over how she represented three former university employees during the Jerry Sandusky child abuse investigation.
"Your concurrent representation of these clients created a significant risk that your ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for each client would be materially limited by your representation of Penn State," James Haggerty, chair of the disciplinary board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, said during the reprimand.
Following the hearing, Baldwin, who served as a justice on the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania from 2006 to 2008, told Corporate Counsel the investigation against her was biased and referred to the process as "aberrant."
"It's interesting to me that the process began without any complainants and there were no fact witnesses presented by disciplinary counsel," Baldwin said.
Baldwin was accused of disclosing privileged information while testifying before a statewide grand jury and failing to disclose a conflict of interest to former Penn State vice president Gary Schultz, former Penn State president Graham Spanier and athletic coach Tim Curley.
In 2018, a panel appointed by the disciplinary board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recommended that Baldwin be cleared of ethics violations. Baldwin said the high court should have followed their recommendation.
Baldwin forwarded Corporate Counsel an affidavit signed Aug. 26, 2019, by retired Judge Barry Feudale. Feudale presided over the grand jury investigating Sandusky.
According to the affidavit, at a July 2012 conference, Tom Darr, the former court administrator of the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, said Justice Thomas G. Saylor wanted to meet privately with Feudale.
Darr, who retired last year, could not be reached for comment.
Saylor allegedly told Feudale that a lawyer's disciplinary complaint against Baldwin was forthcoming and that Feudale should "assist in every way with providing information in support of the disciplinary investigation."
Saylor also allegedly said that assistance and discipline was necessary because Baldwin "caused us a lot of trouble when she was on the Supreme Court with her minority agenda."
"Any suggestion of impropriety—and particularly the assertion about a 'minority agenda'—is patently false. Mr. Feudale was twice removed from service on the bench as supervising grand jury judge in 2013 and senior judge in 2015," a spokesperson for the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts said in an email to Corporate Counsel.
In 2015, Feudale was removed from his post as a senior judge after failing to respond to a letter from Saylor that questioned his judgment and objectivity. In 2013, then Attorney General Kathleen Kane asked the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to stop him from serving as the presiding grand jury judge after allegedly showing a knife to one of her secretaries.
Feudale did not return a message left on a phone number listed for him. He also did not respond to a message sent to his LinkedIn profile.
Baldwin said she retired from practicing law earlier this year. This is the first time she has publicly commented on the ethics violation case against her.
"The reason I am speaking out now is because I don't want this to ever happen to anybody else and I certainly don't want it to happen to any lawyers of color," Baldwin said.
Baldwin is represented by Charles DeMonaco, a partner at Fox Rothschild in Pittsburgh, and Robert Tintner, a partner at Fox Rothschild in Philadelphia.
"It has been a pleasure and honor to represent and get to know Justice Baldwin. She is a person of integrity, honor and exceptional character," DeMonaco said in an email to Corporate Counsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFormer Rutgers Law School Dean Replaces Hoffman as University General Counsel on Interim Basis
4 minute readAs Student Workers Unionize in Droves, NLRB Tries to Prevent Colleges' Privacy Concerns From Slowing Momentum
5 minute readDemise of Chevron Deference Likely Played a Major Role in Successful Title IX Challenges, Experts Say
4 minute readHarvard Hires Ex-Defense Department GC as Legal Chief at Tumultuous Time
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 2'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 3Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 4These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 5'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250