Understand my Expectations
As you become more focused on business strategy first, and legal implications around those decisions second, you need to make sure your needs and expectations are aligned with what your outside counsel can provide.
March 12, 2021 at 06:09 AM
4 minute read
As you become more focused on business strategy first, and legal implications around those decisions second, you need to make sure your needs and expectations are aligned with what your outside counsel can provide. For the relationship to work, they need to understand that some of the traditional expectations for service delivery have evolved. So it is imperative that, from the very start, you communicate effectively and have a clear understanding of three things: 1. the ground rules; 2. the context and purpose of the work; and 3. what objectives need to be met.
GC Voice
|- "A client must be clear at the start of the relationship what the ground rules and rules of engagement are to be. This is the same as any relationship and will engender trust from the start that can then be built upon as the relationship grows. As a GC, I am only as strong as the weakest member of my team and that includes external advisors. Therefore, make me look good and make me feel valued and we have the beginnings of a match made in heaven!" — Andrew Garard, Group General Counsel & Director of Corporate Affairs, Meggitt
- "A mutual understanding of culture, outcomes, aspirations, reporting, and measurement. A two way discussion on needs and wants of a project. Therefore, a real discussion and two way agreement on options, pricing, solution and timeframes." — Mohammed Ajaz, Global Head of Legal Operational Excellence, National Grid, UK
- "Quality, responsiveness & price, in that order, and we address each in the engagement process. It helps if they're nice, too. Success is defined project by project, and it includes coming in at or under budget." —Son-U Michael Paik, EVP for Legal, Trade and Risk Management, SeAH Holdings, Korea
Lean Adviser Voice
GCs will judge you by how well you meet their personal expectations. Make it your first task to understand the client's business and every facet of the GC's expectations. They're likely to include outcome, deadlines, reporting, price and working methods, as well as relationship staples like transparency, accountability and overall reliability. Remember, all these expectations will be perceived through the GC's prism, so it is crucial to see it from the GC's standpoint. When you fully understand the client's expectations, take stock and consider if they're manageable. If so, memorialise the understanding and if not go back, explain why and suggest alternatives.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Corporate Confidentiality Unlocked: Leveraging Common Interest Privilege for Effective Collaboration
11 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250