How To Emerge From The 2021 AGM Season With Your C-Suite's Best Foot Forward
This spring, your CEO's public conduct and private life will be scrutinized like never before – and not just if there is a whiff of a scandal. Press and public interest has shifted gears and we expect reporting on values and actions. In this article reputation and privacy experts at Schillings and Citigate Dewe Rogerson share their top tips to survive AGM season.
March 29, 2021 at 09:40 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Global Leaders In Law
This spring, your CEO's public conduct and private life will be scrutinized like never before – and not just if there is a whiff of a scandal. Press and public interest has shifted gears and we expect reporting on values and actions.
Below, Juliet Young and Lily Kennett reputation and privacy experts at Schillings, and Caroline Merrell of Citigate Dewe Rogerson share their top tips to help you survive Annual General Meeting season:
Be proactive
|- Be prepared to react quickly to events. The "fleet of foot" approach expected of celebrities and politicians on social issues is now also expected from executive leaders.
- Recognize that headlines and stories don't come out of nowhere. Companies will have to 'read the room' before and during an AGM, and be prepared to account for themselves on a range of tough issues: tax, treatment of employees, social movements, Covid safety measures, and use of public funds, as well as established press favorites like executive pay.
- Executive pay remains a hot topic, especially in light of public funds dispensed to support the economy in the last year, and details of executives' lifestyles – their holiday photos, second homes, assets, and children's lifestyles – all add color to what would otherwise be a dry story about financial statements. Find out what a journalist can easily discover about your leadership and those around them. Look for any personal, private, or residential details that could trigger press or public interest in future.
- Obtain copyright for key images of your leadership where possible to help prevent anything that might be taken out of context from being misused online.
- Remove executives' home addresses from company registries and consider where and how other residential details might show up in the public domain .
- Connect your company secretary with your communications team, so you are on the front foot when any financials are published.
- Don't be hypocritical. Are you making noise about environmental commitments whilst investing in fossil fuels? Are you taking advantage of government furlough schemes whilst letting people go?
Running the AGM
|- Consider the practicalities of your AGM. If you are running a virtual or hybrid AGM, what is the accessibility like and have you excluded any shareholders?
- Ensure your Investor Relations and IT teams are using a suitably secure digital platform where attendees need to register in advance, by a certain date, and perhaps have a secure login.
- Read out a disclaimer at the beginning of the meeting about not recording the meeting and any other information for attendees, such as switching off cameras. Consider the privacy of attendees – to what extent can other attendees see each other's names?
- The moderators should be familiar with the functionality around muting individuals, disabling the chat functions as appropriate.
- Rehearse! Prepare your executives for all eventualities and remember that body language, unscripted sentences, and throwaway remarks during the Q&A can easily turn into headlines.
- Keep an eye out for inaccurate stories in the press before and after the AGM, and react quickly to put out reputational fires before they dominate news coverage.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeing Part of 'a Modern-Day Miracle': A Nonprofit's General Counsel Sees Purpose
6 minute readWhy the GC of Australian Pension Fund UniSuper Keeps More Work In-House
5 minute readInside Track: Would the Thrill of Lawyering for Elon Musk Outweigh the Baggage It Comes With?
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250