Nike Suit Against StockX Pursues Flawed NFT and Counterfeit Theories
Nike claims the lawsuit is to protect its brand and customers, but its approach is misguided. These marketplaces help promote Nike's brand and are a direct result of Nike's effort to limit availability.
May 18, 2022 at 12:28 PM
13 minute read
Earlier this year, Nike sued StockX, an online marketplace selling non-fungible tokens (NFTs) of images containing Nike shoes, claiming that StockX misuses its trademark by minting NFTs that include Nike shoes. Nike's lawsuit says NFTs are "an exciting way for brands to interact with their consumers in and out of the 'metaverse,' and diverse commercial applications of NFTs have emerged throughout the past two years." Nike worries that people who buy these NFTs from StockX may think that Nike authorized the image. The pleadings have some photos of bespoke Nike shoes, such as the 2018 Chunky Dunky SB. Nike filed the suit in federal court in Manhattan with a request for a jury trial. Nike claims the lawsuit is to protect its brand and customers, but its approach is misguided. These marketplaces help promote Nike's brand and are a direct result of Nike's effort to limit availability.
What Is StockX?
StockX is a resale marketplace that sells everything from sneakers to difficult-to-find clothes and toys—all new, although the site is perhaps best known for its sneaker resale market. Nike sneakers are a big part of this resale market, but you can basically find any sort of shoe you want on the StockX site. StockX doesn't actually own or possess the shoes but serves as a platform that matches buyers and sellers—each item has a "lowest seller ask price" and a "highest buyer bid price." These prices constantly fluctuate as buyers match with sellers. When a sale takes place, the seller sends the item to StockX for authentication before it goes to the buyer (with StockX's authentication). The lawsuit cites some Twitter dialogue and Reddit activity (which seems to have no affiliation with StockX) to show consumers are confused about whether Nike authorizes the authentications (assuming actual people are behind these messages). As of April 2021, StockX was valued at $3.8 billion.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250