Legal Departments' Spending Soared Last Year, Fueled by Merger Frenzy, Outside Counsel Rate Hikes
"In the current inflationary environment, it is increasingly important for corporate counsel to keep an eye on rate trends and work closely with outside counsel to manage costs," report author Kris Satkunas said.
June 30, 2022 at 11:19 AM
3 minute read
General Counsel and In House CounselCorporate legal department spending shot up in 2021, pushed up by hourly rate increased by outside law firms and a record year for M&A, a new report shows.
The biggest chunk of spending went to the 50 largest law firms, which all have at least 750 lawyers. They took in 46% of outside counsel spending, according to the report from LexisNexis CounselLink.
Partners in firms with more than 750 lawyers have a median hourly billing rate of $895, 54% higher than the median hourly billing rate of the next tier of firms, the report found.
The 2022 Enterprise Legal Management Trends Report, which is in its ninth year, is based on $49 billion in legal spending across 350,000 timekeepers, 8 million invoices and 1.2 million legal matters.
The median partner rate for firms with 51 to 100 lawyers was $400, while the rate was $405 for firms with 101 to 200 lawyers.
Kris Satkunas, director of strategic consulting for CounselLink and author of the report, said the largest firms' expertise across many practices areas and geographies allows them to command higher rates.
"Legal departments typically choose larger firms to handle more critical, strategic, or high-value work," she said. "For example, bet the farm matters that are M&A, IP litigation, or regulatory issue related, are most often handled by the largest firms because they often have a lot of expertise in these areas, and that expertise continues to grow because they continue to handle most of that work."
Also driving up legal department spending was the record-shattering year for M&A. M&A-related legal fees rose from 4.3% of total legal billing in 2020 to 7.4% in 2021. The median partner rate billed for M&A work jumped 6.1% in 2021, reaching $878.
The report documented the growing use of alternative fee arrangements, continuing a 10-year growth trend. Last year, 14.8% of matters were billed at least partly on a non-hourly basis, while 9.6% of all fees were non-hourly.
"While [less than] 15% of matters being billed under an AFA may not be huge, it is a continuation of a gradual trend that does indicate a willingness to find creative pricing strategies," Satkunas said.
AFAs were used mainly when billing for intellectual property, labor and employment, and insurance.
Nearly 60% of companies consolidated 80% or more of their legal work with 10 or fewer law firms, the report found.
Satkunas said that, although some legal departments will bring more work in-house to reduce outside counsel spending, the most premium work likely will continue to be handled by outside counsel at the largest firms.
"I think that savvy GCs will look to leverage both benchmarking data and the volume of work they provide these firms to minimize continued rate increases," she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250