Snap's Legal Cuts Likely Not Sign of Carnage to Come, Recruiters Say
"Companies need their in-house lawyers. ... So somebody is going to have to do the work—whether it's inside or outside," legal recruiter John Gilmore said.
September 14, 2022 at 02:38 PM
5 minute read
Experts on the in-house legal market say they don't think the recent deep layoffs at Snap, which included prominent members of the legal team, are a sign of things to come at other tech companies.
They cite myriad reasons, including that, at startups especially, legal teams tend to be so small that cuts there don't move the expense needle. Then there's the reality that much of what a legal department does is essential, in good times or bad, and as a result cuts there could force companies to farm out more work to pricey outside counsel.
"Companies need their in-house lawyers," said John Gilmore, founder and managing partner of the legal recruiting firm BarkerGilmore. "You can't live without the corporate governance or litigation or securities or labor and employment or whatever the specialized lawyer is. So somebody is going to have to do the work—whether it's inside or outside."
Law.com reported last week that at least a half dozen in-house lawyers and other legal team members were swept up in a more than 1,200-person layoff at Snap, the Santa Monica, California-based parent of Snapchat. They included a Seattle-based associate general counsel who had joined the company behind a week before she got the pink slip.
In August, Law.com reported that Notarize—a Boston-based remote notarization tech company that laid off about 25% of its 450-person workforce in June, has shrunk its more than 60-person legal department down to 17 over the past year.
Legal-market experts say that while similar examples might pop up in the future, they say legal departments generally will be much more likely to put the brakes on new hires than cut attorneys already on payroll.
Legal recruiters say there is an air of caution at tech companies as they plot 2023 budgets, but they say legal departments rarely are in the crosshairs for cost-cutting.
Legal ops teams—which help departments maximize efficiency and effectiveness—are critical in lean times to help companies make the most of the staff they already have, said Stephanie Corey, CEO of the legal ops consulting firm UpLevel Ops.
"We're hopeful that, as during the pandemic, GCs continue to recognize the necessity of legal ops in order to scale without budget and head count increases," she said.
Sumi Trombley, a senior consultant of UpLevel Ops, added: "Where the pandemic pushed legal departments to adopt baseline technology such as e-signature, the renewed focus on cost-efficiency will challenge legal departments to focus on process and evaluate what they should and should not be undertaking as a department with the resources they have."
Gilmore said the tech companies that might be most vulnerable to layoffs are those highly reliant on selling digital advertising—a sector that has seen a precipitous dropoff.
Citing that trend, the investment firm Barclays this summer cut its stock price outlook for four advertising-dependent tech stalwarts—Snap, Meta, Alphabet and Pinterest.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Puts Beat Down on Ex-Wrestling CEO Vince McMahon for Not Reporting Settlements
3 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readLegal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
4 minute readDLA Piper Adds Former Verizon GC Amid In-House Hiring Spree
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250