New York lawyers are facing court action themselves after unwittingly using fake legal precedents that had been generated by ChatGPT, in a case for a personal injury client in the Federal Court.  When Judge P Kevin Castel examined the cases he concluded 'six of the submitted documents appear to be bogus decisions with bogus quotes and bogus citations.' The story made the front page of the New York Times last month (May) and sent shockwaves around the legal world.  The lawyers involved have been called to a hearing this week (8 June) with the possibility of disciplinary action.  They will be asking to explain how they came to cite non-existing cases and why they should not face penalties for the violation.