![](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2023/09/Micro-chip-767x633.jpg)
The CHIPS and Science Act Turns One Year Old: Intellectual Property Considerations May Facilitate its Future Success
It has been just over a year since President Biden signed the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act into law, promising many things including new jobs, strengthened supply chains, and the revitalization of America's global position in the semiconductor industry, making up for ground lost over the last few decades to countries overseas.
September 06, 2023 at 11:58 AM
5 minute read
It has been just over a year since President Biden signed the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act into law, promising many things including new jobs, strengthened supply chains, and the revitalization of America's global position in the semiconductor industry, making up for ground lost over the last few decades to countries overseas.
The microchip was invented in the United States in the late 1950s, and in the 1990s about 37% of the world's microchips were produced in the United States, but that number has fallen to about 10% today. For a number of reasons, the majority of microchip production, including the most advanced chips, has moved to countries such as Taiwan, Korea, and China. At the time that the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act was proposed, many industries and consumers in the U.S. had been severely impacted by supply chain disruptions and a shortage of microchips, creating both an economic and national security issue. To address this, the Act authorizes the U.S. government to provide financial incentives to expand capacity and stimulate improvement of domestic semiconductor manufacturing, to develop a workforce with the skills needed to support the expanded manufacturing capacity, and to increase research and development into new technologies that enhance the performance and capabilities of the microchips themselves.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/2e/a6/55c8241a4f24a04214ae17dca251/linkedin-v-proxycurl-767x633.jpg)
LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
5 minute read![‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client ‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/17/e1/e7117e22464c94524d382686d8bf/social-media-hearing-2024-040-767x633.jpg)
‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
6 minute read![Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/412/2020/09/Apple-computer-sign-Article-202009041221.jpg)
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Trending Stories
- 1We Must Uphold the Rights of Immigrant Students
- 2Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
- 3How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
- 4How Lower Courts Are Interpreting Justices' Decision in 'Muldrow v. City of St. Louis'
- 5Phantom Income/Retained Earnings and the Potential for Inflated Support
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250