FTC Suit Against Firm That's Not a Probe Target Reflects Rising Tensions Over Agency's Sweeping Document Demands
"What this is a sign of is the FTC is unlikely to back down when they don't receive information," Jamillia Ferris, a partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, said.
October 27, 2023 at 07:51 AM
4 minute read
Investigation
A new Federal Trade Commission lawsuit could suggest trouble ahead for companies that push back against the agency's hefty document-production demands, sometimes for probes in which they're not even a target.
Last week, the agency took the unusual step of suing one of those nontargets, the 257-store liquor chain Total Wine & More, saying its response to an administrative subpoena it received in February 2023 is "severely deficient in multiple respects."
Total Wine is among a cadre of companies arguing that document demands under the FTC's Biden administration leadership have become overly burdensome and overboard. Much of the companies' ire stems from FTC probes into possible violations of the Robinson-Patman Act, a Depression-era antitrust law that had gone unused for decades before FTC Chair Lina Khan dusted it off last year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Congressional Probes Often Catch Companies Off Guard. Is Your Company Ready?
9 minute read
Investigating While Under Investigation: Protecting Privilege and Confidentiality in Internal Investigations
7 minute read
As It Eyes IPO, Exterro Taps Prominent Discovery Expert as First-Ever GC
2 minute read
'Keith Is Constantly Fumbling': The Swift Demise of a Lawyer-Client Relationship
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Vinson & Elkins: Traditional Energy Practice Meets Energy Transition
- 2After 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
- 3Trailblazing Pennsylvania Judge Sylvia Rambo Dies at 88
- 4Alston & Bird Matches Market Rate for Associate Bonuses
- 5Commentary: Freedom's Just Another Word
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
