The Compensation Puzzle: An Added Piece Is 'Compensation Culture'
There's one piece that may be the most critical to ensuring you are walking into a compensation negotiation from a position of strength: Have a grasp of a company's compensation philosophy, otherwise known as their "compensation culture." Compensation culture will dictate salary ranges, the negotiation and everything in between.
January 17, 2024 at 11:21 AM
6 minute read
Lawyer Compensation - In-House
There is no doubt that the topic of compensation for in-house attorneys is very complex. Understanding the numerous components involved can make even the best minds deeply confused. Compensation packages consist of a base salary, a bonus in many cases, equity with a range of structures, and then an array of benefits that often complete the picture. And let's not forget the compensation structure can vary significantly at a private company versus a public company. Admittedly, it is very hard to keep it all straight, and any added elements only make this muddy picture even murkier!
There's one piece that may be the most critical to ensuring you are walking into a compensation negotiation from a position of strength: Have a grasp of a company's compensation philosophy, otherwise known as their "compensation culture." Compensation culture will dictate salary ranges, the negotiation and everything in between. You may be armed with research, but you also must understand this key puzzle piece to ensure a successful compensation negotiation and that your expectations around compensation align with how your future employer views this important topic.
What is the "compensation culture" of a company and why does it matter?
You may have heard this term and wondered exactly what it means. Simply stated, compensation culture is the way in which a company thinks about and allocates different components of its compensation packages. It is their philosophy when it comes to paying their leaders and is applied to how they arrive at compensation packages for these leaders. This philosophy can vary dramatically from company to company depending on size, industry, and location, among other factors. Whether a company is public or private is also another crucial component as the way in which a package is structured in a private company, particularly at the executive level, will look different—often with an emphasis on equity.
What types of compensation cultures might you encounter?
Your expectations around a company's compensation structure may be quite different from its actual culture. Some companies may offer compensation packages with a heavy cash component. In this, they may rely on a strong base salary but have a weaker bonus structure, or they may offer below market base compensation but have above market bonus structures. Or they may be above market on both but offer limited or no equity. Others may be an equity heavy culture, so cash amounts will be lower.
The compensation culture of a company will affect the way you think about your compensation package and how you negotiate at the offer stage. If cash is important to you, then a company that leans heavily on equity will not be the right match. For candidates who see a strong equity package as an opportunity for long-term wealth creation, companies that offer little or no equity will not be interesting. The key takeaway is that you must think about your drivers as you enter a compensation negotiation to reach the right place.
How does the compensation culture affect a compensation negotiation?
A company's compensation culture will play a critical piece in your "asks." Keep in mind, a company will not change their compensation culture for you. As John Nixon, a partner at Duane Morris in Philadelphia, shared in a recent webinar, "Your negotiation strategy is going to be driven by the company's compensation culture. … Asking for more when it doesn't have a rationale behind it is a mistake. So, if you frame your requests in the context of [the company's] culture, that will lead to success."
For example, take a candidate who is negotiating a package with a company where the compensation culture emphasizes equity. Someone who enters the negotiation focusing on increasing their cash compensation will be seen as unreasonable at best and, at worst, as lacking a basic understanding of the company's compensation philosophy (which by this stage in the process should be clear). The right tactic is to approach the conversation by demonstrating a deep understanding of the company's equity structure (options, restricted stock, RSUs, etc.), vesting triggers (time-based and/or performance based), and grant frequency (one time or annual refresh), among other key variables.
In fact, this may be the perfect time to consult with an executive compensation attorney who can help you think about how to structure any package you might consider and how to ask for what makes sense within a company's parameters. Figuring out what you want and need and matching that to a company's structure will ease negotiations.
As noted, there are some asks that will not align with the culture and, therefore, may seem unreasonable—a negotiating place you don't want to lead from. But most importantly, know yourself and your levers and stay true to those. You should understand your future employer's compensation culture early in the discussion so you can honestly decide if it matches with your long-term goals.
What is the difference between compensation cultures in public and private companies?
The final and perhaps trickiest piece of the puzzle is the difference in the compensation culture between a public and a private company. It is fairly easy to gain an understanding of a public company's compensation structure through public filings.
To determine where your compensation should fall for a public company, John Nixon suggests looking at both the "vertical equity" and the "horizontal equity." Vertical equity is how your GC compensation compares with the C-suite at a company. This information should be generally available in public filings. Horizontally, you might consider using peer data as leverage to see where you should fall. It's more art than science, but using the data in public filings is part of the science. Also knowing what the previous GC made can be used as a benchmark, but not an absolute guarantee as to where you may fall in the structure.
A private company is another factor. There are many types of private companies: family-owned, closely held, private equity portfolio companies, and so on. The compensation culture of these entities can be tough, even a black box in some cases. You will need to ask questions to determine the culture in these instances. However, with private equity portfolio companies, there is almost always solid cash, but a heavy reliance on equity tied to a future "liquidation event" (e.g., acquisition or IPO) that in many cases is a true opportunity for wealth creation. Consult an expert to determine what questions you should be asking and how to find out the company's culture in this regard.
A company's compensation culture is a critical puzzle piece you must understand as you approach compensation negotiations. Coming armed into a conversation knowing what you need and expect will also help make negotiations go smoother. Your ultimate goal is to know yourself and to also know as much as you can about the company you are interested in joining so you make the best decision for your career.
Heather Fine is a partner with the in-house counsel recruiting team with Major, Lindsey & Africa.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Gives Legal Departments New Leverage to Demand Speed, Efficiency From Law Firms
3 minute readTexas' Highest-Paid GCs: Companies New to State Snag Top Spots
Microsoft's Banner Year Pushed Brad Smith's Pay Sharply Higher
Cisco CLO's Comp Surges in Year Marked by Huge Acquisition, Declining Sales
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250