Judge Whittles Down Artists' Landmark AI Copyright Suit but Keeps Core Infringement Claims Alive
Judge William Orrick found that the cartoonists, painters and illustrators who filed the case have plausibly shown their works were used in AI training, which he said was sufficient to allow the case testing whether the fair use doctrine applies to AI-powered image generation tools to move forward.
August 13, 2024 at 08:03 AM
5 minute read
Artificial IntelligenceA federal judge late Monday trimmed claims against AI-powered image creators accused of ripping off artists' work but said the artists' direct copyright infringement theories should be put to the test on summary judgment.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs AI Transforms Drug Development, FDA Is Scrambling to Figure Out Guardrails
5 minute readCLOs Still Jazzed About Gen Al, Even as They Realize Successfully Implementing It Is Harder Than It Looks
2 minute readHow Gen AI Is Changing Legal Work for In-House Counsel
AI Gives Legal Departments New Leverage to Demand Speed, Efficiency From Law Firms
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-60
- 2California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 3Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 4Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 5Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250