Mitigating Off-Channel Communications: A Guide for In-House Counsel and Compliance Professionals
Off-channel communications—those that occur outside of approved corporate systems—can pose a considerable challenge for regulatory compliance, data security and overall business integrity.
August 20, 2024 at 01:15 PM
12 minute read
AnalysisThe rise of digital communication tools has transformed how employees interact within organizations. However, with the convenience of third-party apps like WhatsApp, WeChat and personal text messages comes significant compliance risks. Off-channel communications—those that occur outside of approved corporate systems—can pose a considerable challenge for regulatory compliance, data security and overall business integrity. This article delves into the complexities of off-channel communications, exploring employee behaviors, storage of communications, and strategies for in-house counsel and compliance/risk professionals to consider in addressing this pervasive issue.
The Problem: Employees Are Using Third-Party Communication Channels to Conduct Business
Off-channel communications refer to the use of unauthorized or unmonitored platforms for business-related communications. Despite policies dictating the use of corporate communication tools, employees often resort to personal messaging apps for various reasons, including convenience, speed and familiarity. This can expose organizations to significant risks, including:
- Regulatory Noncompliance: Regulatory bodies including the SEC, CFTC, HHS, FDA, FCC, FTC, FERC, NERC, and others mandate that companies maintain comprehensive records of business-related communications. Failure to do so can result in hefty fines and legal penalties. (See, e.g., Press Release, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Sixteen Firms to Pay More than $81 Million Combined to Settle Charges for Widespread Recordkeeping Failures (Feb. 9, 2024), https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024-18; Release No. 8599-22, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC Orders 11 Financial Institutions to Pay Over $710 Million for Recordkeeping and Supervision Failures for Widespread Use of Unapproved Communication Methods (Sept. 27, 2022), https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8599-22).
- Data Security Threats: Using unmonitored platforms increases the risk of data breaches. Sensitive business information may be exposed to unauthorized access, leading to potential data loss or theft.
- Reputational Damage: Noncompliance and data breaches can significantly damage an organization's reputation, eroding trust with clients, partners, and stakeholders.
- Operational Inefficiencies: Managing multiple communication channels without a centralized system can lead to inefficiencies and hinder effective communication within the organization. It can also impact completeness and timeliness in responding to a document request or subpoena.
Understanding Employee Communication Behaviors
Employees today have access to a myriad of communication tools, from corporate emails and internal messaging platforms to third-party apps like WhatsApp and WeChat. Despite clear policies, employees may use off-channel communications for several reasons:
- Convenience and Familiarity: Personal messaging apps are often more user-friendly and familiar, making them an easy choice for quick communication.
- Perceived Efficiency: Employees might believe that these apps allow for faster and more efficient communication, particularly in fast-paced environments.
- Accessibility: With the rise of remote work and BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) policies, employees are increasingly using their personal devices for work purposes, often toggling between personal and professional communications.
Understanding these behaviors is crucial for developing effective strategies to manage off-channel communications. It's important to recognize that employees are not necessarily acting out of malice or disregard, but rather out of a desire to perform their jobs more efficiently—they want to get things done. Sometimes, the complexity of enterprise-level systems and the way they are deployed within a company can increase the time it takes to complete work, and that can stifle enthusiasm and the sense of urgency employees may have had at some point. Gaining real insight into the psychology of how employees communicate can guide the development of policies and solutions that address the root causes of off-channel communications.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmex Latest Target as Regulators Scrutinize Whether Credit Card Issuers Deliver on Rewards Promises
In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Big Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readDeal Watch: Private Equity Dealmakers Make 2025 Predictions Amid Deal Resurgence
12 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250