Free speech, copyright infringement, and even a bit of unsolicited literary criticism were on the docket Thursday as the Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments about whether a book based on J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye should be barred from being published in this country.
The three-judge appellate panel peppered lawyers on both sides of the dispute over Fredrik Colting’s 60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye with pointed questions about the nature of the book and whether a district court judge had adequately explored whether it was a fair use under copyright law before indefinitely enjoining its publication in the United States.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
