Abortion and the death penalty — these are the issues that have come to represent the ideological divide on the Supreme Court; yet, another contentious subject has received considerable attention from the court (if not from the public): arbitration.
In recent years, the court has heard several cases each term defining when a claim must be arbitrated rather than litigated in court, and what issues are to be determined by an arbitrator or by the court. The Supreme Court has been split 5-4 in many of these cases, with the majority typically opening the door to broader availability of arbitration and greater powers of the arbitrator.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
