When the News Corporation phone-hacking scandal erupted last summer, CEO Rupert Murdoch and son James said that an outside law firm the company hired in 2007 had concluded that the hacking was limited to a rogue reporter. The company’s in-house lawyers, they added, never contradicted that finding.

This time around, under the scrutiny of an investigation in Parliament and a separate judicial inquiry into the media in general, News Corp. hired a slew of lawyers to conduct a second internal probe. The results have been quite different. In this very public forum, the “rogue reporter” defense has been battered into oblivion.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]