A federal appeals court ruling upholding a relatively rare permanent patent injunction offered guidance about how such injunctions can withstand judicial review.
Monday’s U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling in Broadcom Corp. v. Emulex Corp. affirmed Central District of California Judge James Selna’s December 2011 judgments that Emulex infringed Broadcom’s patent and that the patent would not have been obvious, and thus invalid, at the time of invention.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
